Constance C. Schmitz

16 papers receiving 359 citations

Peers

Constance C. Schmitz
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Family Practice 7
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 104
  • Surgery 130
  • Gender Studies 21
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 10
Replace Susan Dawe with:
Susan Dawe Australia
N. Ben Fairweather United Kingdom
Sue Roberts United Kingdom
Kimberly D. Schenarts United States
Pamela Logan United States
Piotr Leszczyński Poland
Aleksandar Višnjić Serbia
Virginia K. Saba United States
Maggie Carson United Kingdom
N. S. Paget Australia
Constance C. Schmitz relative to Susan Dawe Australia Susan Dawe's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.3×
Susan Dawe · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Constance C. Schmitz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Constance C. Schmitz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Constance C. Schmitz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Constance C. Schmitz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Constance C. Schmitz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Constance C. Schmitz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Constance C. Schmitz. The network helps show where Constance C. Schmitz may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside Constance C. Schmitz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Constance C. Schmitz Line = papers co-authored together Constance C. Schmitz links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 2009124
2 200754
3 200952
4 199334
5 200832
6 198825
7 199319
8 199714
9 200912
10 198811
11 20179
12 20127
13 20096
14
An advanced research seminar series for family medicine faculty members.
19895
15 19913
16 19871

About Constance C. Schmitz

Constance C. Schmitz is a scholar working on Surgery, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Education, General Health Professions and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 16 papers that have together received 408 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Surgical Simulation and Training (4 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (4 papers), Higher Education Research Studies (2 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (1 paper), Higher Education Learning Practices (1 paper), Higher Education and Employability (1 paper), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (1 paper) and Health and Medical Research Impacts (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (7 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (104 citations), Surgery (130 citations), Gender Studies (21 citations) and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (10 citations). Constance C. Schmitz has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Jeffrey G. Chipman, Gregory J. Beilman, Carole J. Bland, Susan C. Seatter, Matthew D. Putnam, Julie Agel, Ann E. Van Heest, Michael G. Luxenberg, Blaine R. Worthen and Barbara F. Brandt. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Higher Education, Journal of surgical education, Medical Teacher, Applied Measurement in Education and Annals of Surgery.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact