Thomas C. Smith
Impact in
- Cultural Studies top 0.2%
- Japanese History and Culture
- Economics and Econometrics top 5%
- Historical Economic and Social Studies
Papers in
-
- Japanese History and Culture 31
-
- Historical Economic and Social Studies 2
- Co-authors
- William Wirt Lockwood (1 shared paper)William B. Hauser (1 shared paper)John Whitney Hall (2 shared papers)Robert E. Ward (1 shared paper)Richard K. Beardsley (1 shared paper)James Nakamura (1 shared paper)Susan B. Hanley (2 shared papers)Conrad D. Totman (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The Journal of Economic History (3 papers)The Journal of Asian Studies (2 papers)Past & Present (2 papers)The Journal of Interdisciplinary History (2 papers)The American Historical Review (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Thomas C. Smith
36 papers receiving 702 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 34
- Cultural Studies 290
- Economics and Econometrics 175
- Demography 21
- Anthropology 26
- General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas C. Smith
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas C. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas C. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas C. Smith more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas C. Smith
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas C. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas C. Smith. The network helps show where Thomas C. Smith may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 13 scholars most cited alongside Thomas C. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 41 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1971 | 137 | |
| 2 | 1956 | 112 | |
| 3 | 1959 | 88 | |
| 4 | 1977 | 83 | |
| 5 | 1988 | 70 | |
| 6 | 1973 | 69 | |
| 7 | 1988 | 59 | |
| 8 | 1976 | 50 | |
| 9 | 1969 | 44 | |
| 10 | 1958 | 42 | |
| 11 | 1979 | 39 | |
| 12 | 1986 | 35 | |
| 13 | 1956 | 28 | |
| 14 | 1967 | 21 | |
| 15 | 1952 | 18 | |
| 16 | 1956 | 17 | |
| 17 | 1960 | 14 | |
| 18 | 1988 | 14 | |
| 19 | 1968 | 13 | |
| 20 | The Agrarian origins of modern Japan | 1959 | 10 |
About Thomas C. Smith
Thomas C. Smith is a scholar working on Cultural Studies, Economics and Econometrics, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Nuclear Energy and Engineering and Waste Management and Disposal, having authored 41 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Japanese History and Culture (31 papers), Historical Economic and Social Studies (2 papers) and Rural Development and Agriculture (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cultural Studies (290 citations), Economics and Econometrics (175 citations), Demography (21 citations), Anthropology (26 citations) and General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (11 citations). Thomas C. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include William Wirt Lockwood, William B. Hauser, John Whitney Hall, Robert E. Ward, Richard K. Beardsley, James Nakamura, Susan B. Hanley, Conrad D. Totman, Robert James Smith and Marion J. Jr. Levy. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Economic History, The Journal of Asian Studies, Past & Present, The Journal of Interdisciplinary History and The American Historical Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.