Connie Wiskin
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 5%
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Family Practice top 2%
- Physiology
- Co-authors
- Helen SalisburyJohn SkeltonMartin von FragsteinSally QuilliganJonathan SilvermanAnnie CushingTeresa AllanLouise Burgoyne
- Topics
- Innovations in Medical Education (12 papers)Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (6 papers)Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomIrelandPeru
In The Last Decade
Connie Wiskin
26 papers receiving 653 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 353
- General Health Professions 346
- Psychiatry and Mental health 143
- Family Practice 117
- Physiology 95
Countries citing papers authored by Connie Wiskin
This map shows the geographic impact of Connie Wiskin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Connie Wiskin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Connie Wiskin more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Connie Wiskin
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Connie Wiskin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Connie Wiskin. The network helps show where Connie Wiskin may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Connie Wiskin
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Connie Wiskin. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Connie Wiskin based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Connie Wiskin. Connie Wiskin is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 12 | |
| 4 | 14 | |
| 5 | 18 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 24 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 6 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 8 | |
| 12 | 73 | |
| 13 | 228 | |
| 14 | 2 | |
| 15 | Effects of exposure to mental illness in role-play on undergraduate student attitudes. | 24 |
| 16 | 7 | |
| 17 | 42 | |
| 18 | 24 | |
| 19 | 74 | |
| 20 | 56 |
About Connie Wiskin
Connie Wiskin is a scholar working on Family Practice, Geriatrics and Gerontology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 26 papers that have together received 689 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovations in Medical Education (12 papers), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (6 papers) and Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (117 citations), General Health Professions (346 citations) and Research and Theory (12 citations). Connie Wiskin has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Ireland and Peru. Frequent co-authors include Helen Salisbury, John Skelton, Martin von Fragstein, Sally Quilligan, Jonathan Silverman, Annie Cushing, Teresa Allan, Louise Burgoyne, Andrew Shanks and Nuala Walshe. Their work appears in journals such as BMC Public Health, Medical Education and BMC Health Services Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.