Cong Cheng

857 citations
22 papers · 598 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Cong Cheng

18 papers receiving 572 citations

Peers

Cong Cheng
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Strategy and Management 304
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 131
  • Business and International Management 34
  • Management Information Systems 83
  • Marketing 69
Replace Małgorzata Zięba with:
Małgorzata Zięba Poland
William Y. Degbey Finland
Silvia Avasilcăi Romania
Marta Pérez-Pérez Spain
Johannes Luger Switzerland
Ana Burcharth Denmark
Hartini Ahmad Malaysia
Javier Sendra-García Spain
Anssi Smedlund Finland
María Orero-Blat Spain
Cong Cheng relative to Małgorzata Zięba Poland Małgorzata Zięba's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
Małgorzata Zięba · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Cong Cheng

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cong Cheng's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cong Cheng with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cong Cheng more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Cong Cheng

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cong Cheng. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cong Cheng. The network helps show where Cong Cheng may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Cong Cheng, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Cong Cheng Line = papers co-authored together Cong Cheng links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2020121
2 201797
3 201983
4 202179
5 202036
6 202335
7 201733
8 202328
9 201924
10 202321
11 202317
12 20168
13 20235
14 20243
15 20243
16
The Research on the Relationship among Network Density,Learning Capability and Technological Innovation
20112
17 20152
18 20181
19
The influence of network density and knowledge inflow on the enterprises' management innovation
20110
20 20250

About Cong Cheng

Cong Cheng is a scholar working on Strategy and Management, Economics and Econometrics, Accounting, Sociology and Political Science and Management of Technology and Innovation, having authored 22 papers that have together received 598 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovation and Knowledge Management (15 papers), International Business and FDI (6 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (6 papers), Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research (3 papers), Innovation Policy and R&D (3 papers), Digital Transformation in Industry (3 papers), Firm Innovation and Growth (3 papers) and Business Strategy and Innovation (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Strategy and Management (304 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (131 citations), Business and International Management (34 citations), Management Information Systems (83 citations) and Marketing (69 citations). Cong Cheng has collaborated with scholars based in China, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Monica Yang, Limin Wang, Hongming Xie, Mengxin Zhang, Michael Dempsey, Lulu Yan, Fuming Jiang, Jian Dai, Yang Liu and Ying Zhang. Their work appears in journals such as Management International Review, Journal of Business Research, Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Sustainability and Technovation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact