Colin McLarty

1.1k citations
38 papers · 318 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Colin McLarty

33 papers receiving 261 citations

Peers

Colin McLarty
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
  • Theoretical Computer Science 130
  • History and Philosophy of Science 93
  • Mathematical Physics 114
  • Geometry and Topology 57
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 94
Replace Richard Dedekind with:
Richard Dedekind Germany
Wilfried Sieg United States
John N. Crossley Australia
John P. Mayberry United Kingdom
Dirk van Dalen Netherlands
Philip Ehrlich United States
Yehuda Rav France
Paolo Mancosu United States
W. W. Tait United States
Israel Kleiner Canada
Colin McLarty relative to Richard Dedekind Germany Richard Dedekind's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Richard Dedekind · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Colin McLarty

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Colin McLarty's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Colin McLarty with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Colin McLarty more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Colin McLarty

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Colin McLarty. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Colin McLarty. The network helps show where Colin McLarty may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 5 scholars most cited alongside Colin McLarty, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Colin McLarty Line = papers co-authored together Colin McLarty links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199277
2 198734
3 200429
4 199327
5 199119
6 201019
7 199019
8 198810
9 199310
10 20079
11 19979
12 19927
13 20056
14 20055
15
“THERE IS NO ONTOLOGY HERE”: VISUAL AND STRUCTURAL GEOMETRY IN ARITHMETIC
20085
16 20055
17 19864
18
A finite order arithmetic foundation for cohomology
20112
19 20062
20 19872

About Colin McLarty

Colin McLarty is a scholar working on Theoretical Computer Science, Mathematical Physics, Geometry and Topology, History and Philosophy of Science and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 38 papers that have together received 318 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include History and Theory of Mathematics (17 papers), Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology (9 papers), Mathematics and Applications (7 papers), Philosophy, Science, and History (6 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (5 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (5 papers), Mathematical and Theoretical Analysis (4 papers) and Advanced Mathematical Theories (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Theoretical Computer Science (130 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (93 citations), Mathematical Physics (114 citations), Geometry and Topology (57 citations) and Computational Theory and Mathematics (94 citations). Colin McLarty has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Saunders MacLane, Paolo Mancosu, Emily Riehl, Andrew Granville and Akshay Venkatesh. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophia Mathematica, Journal of Symbolic Logic, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, Journal of Philosophical Logic and Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact