Lucas Blanes
- Biomedical Engineering top 2%
- Molecular Biology
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering
- Spectroscopy top 5%
- Bioengineering top 2%
- Co-authors
- Claudimir Lúcio do LagoJosé Geraldo Alves Brito-NetoJosé Alberto Fracassi da SilvaPhilip DobleClaude RouxR. Verena TaudteAlison BeavisCarlos D. García
- Topics
- Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications (19 papers)Biosensors and Analytical Detection (17 papers)Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques (12 papers)
- Partner nations
- BrazilAustraliaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Lucas Blanes
49 papers receiving 1.5k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 123
- Biomedical Engineering 1.1k
- Molecular Biology 440
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering 304
- Spectroscopy 279
- Bioengineering 215
Countries citing papers authored by Lucas Blanes
This map shows the geographic impact of Lucas Blanes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lucas Blanes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lucas Blanes more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Lucas Blanes
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lucas Blanes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lucas Blanes. The network helps show where Lucas Blanes may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lucas Blanes
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lucas Blanes. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lucas Blanes based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Lucas Blanes. Lucas Blanes is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 6 | |
| 4 | 23 | |
| 5 | 9 | |
| 6 | 7 | |
| 7 | 80 | |
| 8 | 48 | |
| 9 | 42 | |
| 10 | 35 | |
| 11 | 8 | |
| 12 | 21 | |
| 13 | 12 | |
| 14 | 19 | |
| 15 | Lab-on-a-chip screening of methamphetamine and pseudoephedrine in samples from clandestine laboratories. | 1 |
| 16 | 12 | |
| 17 | 75 | |
| 18 | 61 | |
| 19 | 20 | |
| 20 | 42 |
About Lucas Blanes
Lucas Blanes is a scholar working on Toxicology, Biomedical Engineering and Spectroscopy, having authored 50 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications (19 papers), Biosensors and Analytical Detection (17 papers) and Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Bioengineering (215 citations), Biomedical Engineering (1.1k citations) and Spectroscopy (279 citations). Lucas Blanes has collaborated with scholars based in Brazil, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Claudimir Lúcio do Lago, José Geraldo Alves Brito-Neto, José Alberto Fracassi da Silva, Philip Doble, Claude Roux, R. Verena Taudte, Alison Beavis, Carlos D. García, Bruce McCord and Mateus Nóbrega Aoki. Their work appears in journals such as Analytical Chemistry, Analytical Biochemistry and Scientific Reports.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.