Heather Brooks

411 total citations
22 papers, 197 citations indexed

About

Heather Brooks is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Neurology and Rehabilitation. According to data from OpenAlex, Heather Brooks has authored 22 papers receiving a total of 197 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 8 papers in Neurology and 4 papers in Rehabilitation. Recurrent topics in Heather Brooks's work include Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (10 papers), Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (8 papers) and EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (6 papers). Heather Brooks is often cited by papers focused on Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (10 papers), Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (8 papers) and EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (6 papers). Heather Brooks collaborates with scholars based in Canada, United States and Australia. Heather Brooks's co-authors include Daniel M. Blumberger, Benoit H. Mulsant, Tarek K. Rajji, Kevin Brazil, Sheri Burns, Sanjeev Kumar, Peter C. Coyte, Julia Kennedy, Amna Husain and Denise N. Guerriere and has published in prestigious journals such as Biological Psychiatry, Cerebral Cortex and Schizophrenia Bulletin.

In The Last Decade

Heather Brooks

20 papers receiving 195 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Heather Brooks Canada 7 59 55 39 35 33 22 197
Teresa Monreal United States 8 41 0.7× 40 0.7× 47 1.2× 105 3.0× 20 0.6× 11 248
Ineke Bolt Netherlands 11 72 1.2× 195 3.5× 76 1.9× 47 1.3× 17 0.5× 23 382
Carissa Gehl United States 7 42 0.7× 16 0.3× 67 1.7× 31 0.9× 8 0.2× 8 247
Dalma Tényi Hungary 9 24 0.4× 36 0.7× 63 1.6× 51 1.5× 41 1.2× 20 245
Clara Murray Australia 6 19 0.3× 34 0.6× 66 1.7× 79 2.3× 28 0.8× 13 251
Stefanie Danielle Piña‐Escudero United States 10 20 0.3× 56 1.0× 92 2.4× 23 0.7× 11 0.3× 22 239
Lauren R. Sankary United States 8 33 0.6× 20 0.4× 20 0.5× 21 0.6× 6 0.2× 17 133
Elie Guichard France 9 12 0.2× 34 0.6× 98 2.5× 45 1.3× 41 1.2× 13 247
Christine V Tonnu United States 4 18 0.3× 140 2.5× 23 0.6× 55 1.6× 12 0.4× 4 298
Laura I. van Dyck United States 7 29 0.5× 65 1.2× 68 1.7× 40 1.1× 7 0.2× 10 229

Countries citing papers authored by Heather Brooks

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Heather Brooks's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Heather Brooks with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Heather Brooks more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Heather Brooks

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Heather Brooks. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Heather Brooks. The network helps show where Heather Brooks may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Heather Brooks

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Heather Brooks. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Heather Brooks based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Heather Brooks. Heather Brooks is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Brooks, Heather, Daniel M. Blumberger, Sanjeev Kumar, et al.. (2025). Home-based cognitive remediation and transcranial direct current stimulation to enhance cognition in older adults with major depressive disorder or mild cognitive impairment: An open label study. International Psychogeriatrics. 38(2). 100116–100116. 1 indexed citations
3.
Brooks, Heather, Reza Zomorrodi, Wei Wang, et al.. (2025). Individualized frequency and montage tACS to engage theta-gamma coupling and enhance working memory in mild cognitive impairment. Frontiers in Psychiatry. 16. 1565881–1565881. 2 indexed citations
5.
Beroncal, Erika L., Heather Brooks, James L. Kennedy, et al.. (2024). Exploring mitochondrial blood-based and genetic markers in older adults with mild cognitive impairment and remitted major depressive disorder. Translational Psychiatry. 14(1). 457–457. 2 indexed citations
6.
Zhukovsky, Peter, Heather Brooks, Christopher R. Bowie, et al.. (2024). Heterogeneity of Cognition in Older Adults with Remitted Major Depressive Disorder: A Latent Profile Analysis. American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry. 32(7). 867–878. 3 indexed citations
7.
Brooks, Heather, Wei Wang, Reza Zomorrodi, et al.. (2023). Cognitive Function based on Theta‐Gamma Coupling vs. Clinical Diagnosis in Older Adults with Mild Cognitive Impairment with or without Major Depressive Disorder. Alzheimer s & Dementia. 19(S18). 1 indexed citations
8.
Azami, Hamed, Christoph Zrenner, Heather Brooks, et al.. (2023). Beta to Theta Power Ratio in Electroencephalogram Periodic Components to Discriminate Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer’s Dementia. Alzheimer s & Dementia. 19(S17).
9.
Azami, Hamed, Christoph Zrenner, Heather Brooks, et al.. (2023). Beta to theta power ratio in EEG periodic components as a potential biomarker in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s dementia. Alzheimer s Research & Therapy. 15(1). 133–133. 32 indexed citations
10.
11.
Brooks, Heather, Sanjeev Kumar, Michelle S. Goodman, et al.. (2021). Assessing the Longitudinal Relationship between Theta-Gamma Coupling and Working Memory Performance in Older Adults. Cerebral Cortex. 32(8). 1653–1667. 9 indexed citations
13.
Brooks, Heather, Hanadi Ajam Oughli, Subha Subramanian, et al.. (2021). Enhancing Cognition in Older Persons: A Pilot Clinical Trial of Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MBSR) and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS). Biological Psychiatry. 89(9). S194–S195. 1 indexed citations
14.
Brooks, Heather, Hanadi Ajam Oughli, Subha Subramanian, et al.. (2021). Enhancing Cognition in Older Persons: A Pilot Clinical Trial of Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MBSR) and transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS). American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry. 29(4). S105–S106. 1 indexed citations
15.
Brooks, Heather, Reza Zomorrodi, Daniel M. Blumberger, et al.. (2021). Theta Phase-Gamma Amplitude Coupling During Working Memory and its Relationships With Demographic, Clinical, Genetic, Neurochemical, and Neurostructural Measures in Older Adults at Risk for Dementia. Biological Psychiatry. 89(9). S350–S351. 1 indexed citations
16.
Brooks, Heather, Wei Wang, Sanjeev Kumar, et al.. (2020). Assessing the longitudinal relationship between theta‐gamma coupling and working memory performance. Alzheimer s & Dementia. 16(S6). 1 indexed citations
17.
Khan, Waqas Ullah, Zaid Ghazala, Heather Brooks, et al.. (2020). The Impact of Anticholinergic Burden on Functional Capacity in Persons With Schizophrenia Across the Adult Life Span. Schizophrenia Bulletin. 47(1). 249–257. 20 indexed citations
19.
Kumar, Sanjeev, Reza Zomorrodi, Heather Brooks, et al.. (2019). F3‐03‐02: STUDYING THE EFFECTS OF REPETITIVE PAIRED ASSOCIATIVE STIMULATION ON DLPFC PLASTICITY AND MECHANISMS OF WORKING MEMORY IN ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE USING TMS‐EEG AND NBACK‐EEG. Alzheimer s & Dementia. 15(7S_Part_16). 1 indexed citations
20.
Guerriere, Denise N., Amna Husain, Brandon Zagorski, et al.. (2015). Predictors of caregiver burden across the home-based palliative care trajectory in Ontario, Canada. Health & Social Care in the Community. 24(4). 428–438. 75 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026