Early Intervention in Psychiatry

1.6k papers and 24.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.6k papers published in Early Intervention in Psychiatry in the last decades have received a total of 24.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Early Intervention in Psychiatry usually cover Psychiatry and Mental health (1.1k papers), Clinical Psychology (799 papers) and Philosophy (399 papers) specifically the topics of Schizophrenia research and treatment (1.0k papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (399 papers) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (376 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Early Intervention in Psychiatry are Anthony F. Jorm, Jean Addington, Alison R. Yung, Patrick D. McGorry, Barnaby Nelson, Nicola Reavley, Scott W. Woods, Ian B. Hickie, Vinod H. Srihari and Sue Cotton.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Early Intervention in Psychiatry

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Early Intervention in Psychiatry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Early Intervention in Psychiatry.

Countries where authors publish in Early Intervention in Psychiatry

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Early Intervention in Psychiatry. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Early Intervention in Psychiatry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Early Intervention in Psychiatry more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025