Christopher Ohm Clement
Impact in
-
- Archaeological Research and Protection
-
- Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
Papers in
-
- Archaeology and Natural History 3
- Historical and Cultural Archaeology Studies 2
- Colonialism, slavery, and trade 1
-
- Archaeological Research and Protection 1
- Co-authors
- Michael E. Moseley (1 shared paper)Steven D. Smith (2 shared papers)F. J. Rich (1 shared paper)Barbara E. Taylor (1 shared paper)Mark J. Brooks (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Field Archaeology (2 papers)Historical Archaeology (2 papers)Journal of Biomechanics (1 paper)Scholar Commons (University of South Carolina) (1 paper)UMI eBooks (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Christopher Ohm Clement
6 papers receiving 49 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 29
- Space and Planetary Science 6
- Paleontology 29
- Anthropology 28
- Archeology 11
- Horticulture 1
Countries citing papers authored by Christopher Ohm Clement
This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher Ohm Clement's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher Ohm Clement with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher Ohm Clement more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher Ohm Clement
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher Ohm Clement. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher Ohm Clement. The network helps show where Christopher Ohm Clement may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 6 scholars most cited alongside Christopher Ohm Clement, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1991 | 26 | |
| 2 | 1997 | 16 | |
| 3 | 2011 | 5 | |
| 4 | 1991 | 5 | |
| 5 | 2003 | 5 | |
| 6 | Landscapes and plantations on Tobago : a regional perspective | 1995 | 1 |
| 7 | Mapping the Defense of the Charleston to Savannah Railroad: Civil War Earthworks in Beaufort and Jasper Counties, South Carolina | 2000 | 1 |
About Christopher Ohm Clement
Christopher Ohm Clement is a scholar working on Anthropology, Space and Planetary Science, Marketing, Ecology and Cultural Studies, having authored 7 papers that have together received 59 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Archaeology and Natural History (3 papers), Historical and Cultural Archaeology Studies (2 papers), Rangeland and Wildlife Management (1 paper), Colonialism, slavery, and trade (1 paper), American Environmental and Regional History (1 paper), Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies (1 paper), Caribbean history, culture, and politics (1 paper) and Archaeological Research and Protection (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Space and Planetary Science (6 citations), Paleontology (29 citations), Anthropology (28 citations), Archeology (11 citations) and Horticulture (1 citation). Christopher Ohm Clement has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Michael E. Moseley, Michael E. Moseley, Steven D. Smith, F. J. Rich, Barbara E. Taylor and Mark J. Brooks. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Field Archaeology, Historical Archaeology, Journal of Biomechanics, Scholar Commons (University of South Carolina) and UMI eBooks.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.