Countries citing papers authored by Steven D. Smith
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Steven D. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Steven D. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Steven D. Smith more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Steven D. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Steven D. Smith. The network helps show where Steven D. Smith may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Steven D. Smith
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Steven D. Smith.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Steven D. Smith based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Steven D. Smith. Steven D. Smith is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Smith, Steven D.. (2014). The Jurisprudence of Denigration. SSRN Electronic Journal.3 indexed citations
3.
Smith, Steven D.. (2014). Is God Irrelevant. Boston University law review. 94(4). 1339.
4.
Smith, Steven D., et al.. (2013). The Contraception Mandate and Religious Freedom. University of Pennsylvania Law Review. 161(1). 5.
5.
Smith, Steven D.. (2011). The Paralyzing Paradox of Religious Neutrality. SSRN Electronic Journal.1 indexed citations
6.
Smith, Steven D.. (2010). Religious Freedom and its Enemies, or Why the Smith Decision may be a Greater Loss Now than it was Then. SSRN Electronic Journal.1 indexed citations
7.
Smith, Steven D.. (2010). Constitutional Divide: The Transformative Significance of the School Prayer Decisions. Pepperdine law review. 38(4). 1.
8.
Smith, Steven D.. (2006). The Jurisdiction Establishment Clause: A Reappraisal. The Notre Dame law review. 81(5). 1843.2 indexed citations
9.
Smith, Steven D.. (2006). The Jurisdictional Establishment Clause: A Reappraisal. SSRN Electronic Journal.2 indexed citations
10.
Smith, Steven D.. (2006). The (Always) Imminent Death of the Law. Digital USD (University of San Diego).1 indexed citations
11.
Smith, Steven D.. (2005). Bakhtin and Chariton: A Revisionist Reading. 1003. 164–192.1 indexed citations
Smith, Steven D.. (2005). The Tenuous Case for Conscience. Digital USD (University of San Diego). 10(2). 3.2 indexed citations
14.
Smith, Steven D.. (2003). The Promise and Perils of Conscience. Brigham Young University law review. 2003(3). 1057–1067.1 indexed citations
15.
Smith, Steven D.. (2003). Made in the Timber: A Settlement History of the Fort Leonard Wood Region. Scholar Commons (University of South Carolina).1 indexed citations
16.
Smith, Steven D.. (2001). Expressivist Jurisprudence and the Depletion of Meaning. Maryland law review. 60(3). 506.4 indexed citations
17.
Smith, Steven D.. (2000). Blooming Confusion: Madison's Mixed Legacy. Indiana law journal. 75(1). 9.1 indexed citations
18.
Smith, Steven D.. (1999). Believing Like A Lawyer. Boston College law review. 40(5). 1041.6 indexed citations
19.
Smith, Steven D.. (1998). Legal Discource and the De Facto Disestablishment. Marquette law review. 81(2). 203.1 indexed citations
20.
Smith, Steven D.. (1998). Is a Coherent Theory of Religious Freedom Possible. eYLS (Yale Law School). 15(1). 73–86.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.