Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Countries citing papers authored by Christopher Nobes
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher Nobes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher Nobes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher Nobes more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher Nobes
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher Nobes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher Nobes. The network helps show where Christopher Nobes may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Christopher Nobes
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Christopher Nobes.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Christopher Nobes based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Christopher Nobes. Christopher Nobes is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Nobes, Christopher & Christian Stadler. (2016). Impaired Comparisons and Translations: International Differences in IFRS Impairment Reversal. SSRN Electronic Journal.1 indexed citations
2.
Nobes, Christopher & Christian Stadler. (2015). The Qualitative Characteristics of Financial Information, and Managers’ Accounting Decisions: Evidence from IFRS Policy Changes. Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University).1 indexed citations
3.
Nobes, Christopher. (2014). The Development of double entry : selected essays. Routledge eBooks.1 indexed citations
Kvaal, Erlend & Christopher Nobes. (2011). IFRS Policy Changes and the Continuation of National Patterns of IFRS Practice. SSRN Electronic Journal.8 indexed citations
6.
Kvaal, Erlend & Christopher Nobes. (2009). International Differences in IFRS Policy Choice. SSRN Electronic Journal.19 indexed citations
7.
Nobes, Christopher, et al.. (2007). Los problemas de las NIIF. CentAUR (University of Reading). 135–146.
8.
Nobes, Christopher, et al.. (2004). Financial accounting: an international introduction. 2nd edition.. CentAUR (University of Reading).1 indexed citations
Parker, R. H. & Christopher Nobes. (1994). An international view of true and fair accounting.23 indexed citations
12.
Nobes, Christopher. (1994). International guide to interpreting company accounts : overcoming disparities in national accounting procedures. OpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique).3 indexed citations
Nobes, Christopher, et al.. (1992). International corporate procedures.1 indexed citations
16.
Nobes, Christopher. (1992). Accounting harmonisation in Europe : process, progress and prospects. OpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique).2 indexed citations
17.
Nobes, Christopher. (1990). Accounting harmonisation in Europe : towards 1992. OpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique).3 indexed citations
18.
Nobes, Christopher. (1989). Interpreting European financial statements : towards 1992. Butterworths eBooks.13 indexed citations
Nobes, Christopher. (1986). Financial reporting in the UK and the EEC : mutual influences.4 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.