Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Towards a Theory of Cultural Influence on the Development of Accounting Systems Internationally
Countries citing papers authored by Sidney J. Gray
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Sidney J. Gray's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sidney J. Gray with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sidney J. Gray more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sidney J. Gray. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sidney J. Gray. The network helps show where Sidney J. Gray may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sidney J. Gray
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sidney J. Gray.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sidney J. Gray based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Sidney J. Gray. Sidney J. Gray is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Morris, Richard D. & Sidney J. Gray. (2007). 1 Corporate Transparency Differences in the Asian Region: the Feasibility of Global Standardization in Practice?.8 indexed citations
Brennan, Niamh & Sidney J. Gray. (2005). The impact of materiality : accounting’s best kept secret. Asian Academy of Management Journal of Accounting and Finance. 1(1). 1–31.26 indexed citations
Brennan, Niamh & Sidney J. Gray. (2000). Rhetoric and argument in financial reporting : disclosures in profit forecasts and takeover documents. Research Repository UCD (University College Dublin).10 indexed citations
12.
Brennan, Niamh & Sidney J. Gray. (1998). Voluntary Disclosure of Profit Forecasts: Factors Influencing Information Disclosed during UK Takeover Bids. Research Repository UCD (University College Dublin).1 indexed citations
Weetman, Pauline, Carol A. Adams, & Sidney J. Gray. (1993). Issues in international accounting harmonisation : the significance of UK/US accounting differences and implications for the IASC's comparability project.1 indexed citations
15.
Nobes, Christopher, et al.. (1992). International corporate procedures.1 indexed citations
16.
Gray, Sidney J., et al.. (1991). Making corporate reports valuable : a survey of corporate reporting practices by major UK companies.10 indexed citations
17.
Gray, Sidney J. & Michael C. McDermott. (1989). Mega-merger mayhem : takeover strategies, battles & controls.1 indexed citations
18.
Gray, Sidney J. & Adolf G. Coenenberg. (1988). International group accounting : international harmonisation and the seventh EEC directive.2 indexed citations
19.
Gray, Sidney J., et al.. (1984). Information disclosure and the multinational corporation. Wiley eBooks.29 indexed citations
20.
Gray, Sidney J., et al.. (1984). International financial reporting : a comparative international survey of accounting requirements and practices in 30 countries. St Martin's Press eBooks.17 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.