Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Board Characteristics and Audit Fees*
2002733 citationsJoseph V. Carcello, Dana R. Hermanson et al.Contemporary Accounting Researchprofile →
Audit Committee Composition and Auditor Reporting
2000685 citationsJoseph V. Carcello, Terry L. NealThe Accounting Reviewprofile →
The Audit Committee Oversight Process*
2009677 citationsMark S. Beasley, Joseph V. Carcello et al.Contemporary Accounting Researchprofile →
Audit Committee Characteristics and Auditor Dismissals following “New” Going-Concern Reports
2003599 citationsJoseph V. Carcello, Terry L. NealThe Accounting Reviewprofile →
Impact of Auditor Report Changes on Financial Reporting Quality and Audit Costs: Evidence from the United Kingdom
2019226 citationsLauren C. Reid, Joseph V. Carcello et al.Contemporary Accounting Researchprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Terry L. Neal's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Terry L. Neal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Terry L. Neal more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Terry L. Neal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Terry L. Neal. The network helps show where Terry L. Neal may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Terry L. Neal
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Terry L. Neal.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Terry L. Neal based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Terry L. Neal. Terry L. Neal is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Beasley, Mark S., Joseph V. Carcello, Dana R. Hermanson, & Terry L. Neal. (2009). The Audit Committee Oversight Process*. Contemporary Accounting Research. 26(1). 65–122.677 indexed citations breakdown →
Williams, Jan R., Joseph V. Carcello, & Terry L. Neal. (2005). Miller GAAP guide level A : restatement and analysis of current FASB standards. Bulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens Kew).2 indexed citations
Carcello, Joseph V. & Terry L. Neal. (2003). Audit Committee Independence and Disclosure: Choice for Financially Distressed Firms. SSRN Electronic Journal.3 indexed citations
15.
Carcello, Joseph V. & Terry L. Neal. (2003). Audit Committee Characteristics and Auditor Dismissals following “New” Going-Concern Reports. The Accounting Review. 78(1). 95–117.599 indexed citations breakdown →
16.
Carcello, Joseph V. & Terry L. Neal. (2002). Audit Committee Characteristics and Auditor Dismissals Following 'New' Going-Concern Reports. SSRN Electronic Journal.51 indexed citations
17.
Carcello, Joseph V., Dana R. Hermanson, & Terry L. Neal. (2002). Disclosures in Audit Committee Charters and Reports. DigitalCommons - Kennesaw State University (Kennesaw State University).4 indexed citations
18.
Carcello, Joseph V., Dana R. Hermanson, & Terry L. Neal. (2002). Auditor Reporting Behavior when GAAS Lack Specificity: The Case of SAS No. 59. SSRN Electronic Journal.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.