Christopher Nabors

47 papers receiving 502 citations

Peers

Christopher Nabors
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Family Practice 38
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 149
  • Emergency Medicine 55
  • Gastroenterology 23
  • General Health Professions 101
Replace Hélène Gilet with:
Hélène Gilet France
María Marqueta de Salas Spain
Nicolas Lerolle France
Lauren Gilstrap United States
Stephen Harper United States
Roberta Petrino Italy
Ameen Patel Canada
Melissa Lingohr-Smith United States
Mickaël Basson France
Carole Ayav France
Christopher Nabors relative to Hélène Gilet France Hélène Gilet's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Hélène Gilet · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Christopher Nabors

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher Nabors's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher Nabors with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher Nabors more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher Nabors

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher Nabors. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher Nabors. The network helps show where Christopher Nabors may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Christopher Nabors, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Christopher Nabors Line = papers co-authored together Christopher Nabors links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 48 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2019107
2 201827
3 201425
4 201324
5 201923
6 202023
7 202021
8 201519
9 201319
10 202215
11 201915
12 201114
13 201713
14 201413
15 201912
16 201812
17 201310
18 202010
19 202010
20 20119

About Christopher Nabors

Christopher Nabors is a scholar working on Surgery, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions and Epidemiology, having authored 48 papers that have together received 520 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Primary Care and Health Outcomes (5 papers), Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment (4 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (4 papers), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (4 papers), COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies (4 papers), Electronic Health Records Systems (3 papers), Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies (3 papers) and Hospital Admissions and Outcomes (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (38 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (149 citations), Emergency Medicine (55 citations), Gastroenterology (23 citations) and General Health Professions (101 citations). Christopher Nabors has collaborated with scholars based in United States, India and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include William H. Frishman, Wilbert S. Aronow, Srikanth Yandrapalli, Abhishek Goyal, Abhay Dhand, Stephen J. Peterson, Sachin Sule, Seigo Nishida, Shantanu Solanki and Sahil Khera. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Therapeutics, Cardiology in Review, Archives of Medical Science, The American Journal of Medicine and Journal of Patient Safety.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact