Cardiology in Review

1.5k papers and 21.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.5k papers published in Cardiology in Review in the last decades have received a total of 21.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Cardiology in Review usually cover Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (920 papers), Surgery (463 papers) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (241 papers) specifically the topics of Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (152 papers), Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments (143 papers) and Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (125 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Cardiology in Review are William H. Frishman, Wilbert S. Aronow, James J. Nawarskas, Franklin H. Zimmerman, Scott M. Grundy, Christopher M. Celano, Jeff C. Huffman, David J. Gordon, Sidney C. Smith and Ronald M. Krauss.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Cardiology in Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Cardiology in Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Cardiology in Review.

Countries where authors publish in Cardiology in Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Cardiology in Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Cardiology in Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cardiology in Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025