Archives of Medical Science

3.0k papers and 37.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 3.0k papers published in Archives of Medical Science in the last decades have received a total of 37.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Archives of Medical Science usually cover Surgery (653 papers), Molecular Biology (544 papers) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (512 papers) specifically the topics of Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research (110 papers), Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health (105 papers) and MicroRNA in disease regulation (94 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Archives of Medical Science are Undurti N. Das, Maciej Banach, Siresha Bathina, Wilbert S. Aronow, Marisa Coelho, Teresa Oliveira, Rúben Fernandes, Ismail Patimah, Asmah Rahmat and Huzwah Khaza’ai.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Archives of Medical Science

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Archives of Medical Science. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Archives of Medical Science.

Countries where authors publish in Archives of Medical Science

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Archives of Medical Science. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Archives of Medical Science with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Archives of Medical Science more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025