Christopher Lim

29 papers receiving 315 citations

Peers

Christopher Lim
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
  • Human-Computer Interaction 39
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 7
  • Demography 49
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 25
  • Information Systems and Management 21
Replace Jaana Näsänen with:
Jaana Näsänen Finland
Simone Bacellar Leal Ferreira Brazil
Tobias Brockmann Germany
Jeferson Arango‐López Colombia
D. N. F. Awang Iskandar Malaysia
José Luis Montes Spain
Tuukka Lehtiniemi Finland
Gary Kok Yew Chan Singapore
Myriam Arrue Spain
Judith Igelsböck Austria
Christopher Lim relative to Jaana Näsänen Finland Jaana Näsänen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Jaana Näsänen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Christopher Lim

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher Lim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher Lim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher Lim more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher Lim

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher Lim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher Lim. The network helps show where Christopher Lim may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Christopher Lim, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Christopher Lim Line = papers co-authored together Christopher Lim links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201858
2 200949
3 201542
4 201732
5 199522
6 201422
7 200918
8 201712
9 20199
10 20198
11 20166
12
Lemmatic Machine Translation
20096
13 20125
14 20155
15 20114
16 20174
17 20063
18 20113
19 20173
20 20073

About Christopher Lim

Christopher Lim is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Museology, Aerospace Engineering and Astronomy and Astrophysics, having authored 34 papers that have together received 332 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Space Exploration and Technology (5 papers), Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (4 papers), Planetary Science and Exploration (4 papers), Astro and Planetary Science (4 papers), Spacecraft Design and Technology (3 papers), Space Satellite Systems and Control (3 papers), Robotic Path Planning Algorithms (3 papers) and Technology Use by Older Adults (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (39 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (7 citations), Demography (49 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (25 citations) and Information Systems and Management (21 citations). Christopher Lim has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Manuela Farinosi, Irene K.H. Chew, Abhinandan Jain, Amr Ahmed, Dávid Fröhlich, Rodney Mountain, Thilo Kroll, Yiping Tu, Thomas A. Weston and Po‐Yu Lin. Their work appears in journals such as SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series, The International Journal of Human Resource Management, CoDesign, Journal of Aircraft and Science Translational Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact