Christopher L. Williams
- Clinical Psychology top 2%
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Epidemiology top 10%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 5%
- Molecular Biology
- Co-authors
- Janet HainesKerryn L. BrainGeorge WilsonCheryl L. PerryMark WolfsonAlexander C. WagenaarPaul G. McGovernSara Veblen‐Mortenson
- Topics
- Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (26 papers)Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (8 papers)Pediatric health and respiratory diseases (8 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited StatesSingapore
In The Last Decade
Christopher L. Williams
66 papers receiving 1.8k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 128
- Clinical Psychology 991
- General Health Professions 392
- Epidemiology 386
- Psychiatry and Mental health 272
- Molecular Biology 250
Countries citing papers authored by Christopher L. Williams
This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher L. Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher L. Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher L. Williams more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher L. Williams
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher L. Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher L. Williams. The network helps show where Christopher L. Williams may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Christopher L. Williams
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Christopher L. Williams. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Christopher L. Williams based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Christopher L. Williams. Christopher L. Williams is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 11 | |
| 3 | 6 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 7 | |
| 6 | 25 | |
| 7 | 6 | |
| 8 | 56 | |
| 9 | 33 | |
| 10 | 26 | |
| 11 | 6 | |
| 12 | 4 | |
| 13 | 17 | |
| 14 | 91 | |
| 15 | 369 | |
| 16 | 21 | |
| 17 | 155 | |
| 18 | Correlates of impulsive suicidal behaviour. | 7 |
| 19 | 2 | |
| 20 | 7 |
About Christopher L. Williams
Christopher L. Williams is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Aging and Emergency Medical Services, having authored 68 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (26 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (8 papers) and Pediatric health and respiratory diseases (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (991 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (272 citations) and General Health Professions (392 citations). Christopher L. Williams has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Singapore. Frequent co-authors include Janet Haines, Kerryn L. Brain, George Wilson, Cheryl L. Perry, Mark Wolfson, Alexander C. Wagenaar, Paul G. McGovern, Sara Veblen‐Mortenson, Iain Montgomery and Kelli A. Komro. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet, Journal of Biological Chemistry and Blood.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.