John C. Parker
- Clinical Psychology top 2%
- Epidemiology top 10%
- Infectious Diseases top 5%
- Immunology top 10%
- Genetics top 10%
- Co-authors
- Grace M. BarnesWilliam F. WieczorekJohn W. WelteMarie‐Cecile O. TidwellMichael J. CollinsWallace P. RoweJohn D. EstesMurray B. Gardner
- Topics
- Animal Virus Infections Studies (7 papers)Virus-based gene therapy research (6 papers)Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesQatarItaly
In The Last Decade
John C. Parker
51 papers receiving 2.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 139
- Clinical Psychology 897
- Epidemiology 427
- Infectious Diseases 299
- Immunology 276
- Genetics 245
Countries citing papers authored by John C. Parker
This map shows the geographic impact of John C. Parker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John C. Parker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John C. Parker more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John C. Parker
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John C. Parker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John C. Parker. The network helps show where John C. Parker may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John C. Parker
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John C. Parker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John C. Parker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John C. Parker. John C. Parker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6 | |
| 2 | 29 | |
| 3 | Medication adherence changes following value-based insurance design. | 35 |
| 4 | 16 | |
| 5 | 94 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 263 | |
| 9 | 388 | |
| 10 | 35 | |
| 11 | 53 | |
| 12 | 26 | |
| 13 | 29 | |
| 14 | 31 | |
| 15 | 18 | |
| 16 | 88 | |
| 17 | 165 | |
| 18 | Effect of caesarean-derivation, gnotobiote foster nursing and barrier maintenance of an inbred mouse colony on enzootic virus status. | 2 |
| 19 | Effect of population density on adult worm survival in primary Nippostrongylus brasiliensis infections in the rat. | 13 |
| 20 | 21 |
About John C. Parker
John C. Parker is a scholar working on Family Practice, Animal Science and Zoology and Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management, having authored 55 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Animal Virus Infections Studies (7 papers), Virus-based gene therapy research (6 papers) and Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management (83 citations), Family Practice (98 citations) and Clinical Psychology (897 citations). John C. Parker has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Qatar and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Grace M. Barnes, William F. Wieczorek, John W. Welte, Marie‐Cecile O. Tidwell, Michael J. Collins, Wallace P. Rowe, John D. Estes, Murray B. Gardner, Matthew L. Maciejewski and Joel F. Farley. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Science and New England Journal of Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.