Christopher Blair
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Political Science and International Relations top 10%
- Clinical Psychology
- Gender Studies
- Development top 10%
- Co-authors
- Jeremy M. WeinsteinGuy GrossmanPhilip PotterMichael C. HorowitzJonathan ChuErica ChenowethEvan PerkoskiAustin L. Wright
- Topics
- Political Conflict and Governance (7 papers)Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence (6 papers)Migration and Labor Dynamics (6 papers)
- Journals
- American Political Science ReviewAmerican Journal of Political ScienceInternational Organization
- Partner nations
- United StatesSingapore
In The Last Decade
Christopher Blair
24 papers receiving 169 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
- Sociology and Political Science 137
- Political Science and International Relations 51
- Clinical Psychology 31
- Gender Studies 27
- Development 15
Countries citing papers authored by Christopher Blair
This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher Blair's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher Blair with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher Blair more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher Blair
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher Blair. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher Blair. The network helps show where Christopher Blair may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Christopher Blair
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Christopher Blair. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Christopher Blair based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Christopher Blair. Christopher Blair is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 6 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 0 | |
| 10 | 3 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 39 | |
| 13 | 13 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 2 | |
| 17 | 34 | |
| 18 | 12 | |
| 19 | 3 | |
| 20 | 5 |
About Christopher Blair
Christopher Blair is a scholar working on Development, Sociology and Political Science and Gender Studies, having authored 27 papers that have together received 181 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Political Conflict and Governance (7 papers), Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence (6 papers) and Migration and Labor Dynamics (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Development (15 citations), Sociology and Political Science (137 citations) and Gender Studies (27 citations). Christopher Blair has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Singapore. Frequent co-authors include Jeremy M. Weinstein, Guy Grossman, Philip Potter, Michael C. Horowitz, Jonathan Chu, Erica Chenoweth, Evan Perkoski and Austin L. Wright. Their work appears in journals such as American Political Science Review, American Journal of Political Science and International Organization.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.