Christiane Theda
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- Genetics top 5%
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health top 10%
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
- Clinical Biochemistry top 2%
- Co-authors
- Ethylin Wang JabsAnn B. MoserGregory A. MeyersJeffrey M. CraigYuk Jing LokePamela LeongAnna CzajkoAli Fatemi
- Topics
- Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (9 papers)Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors (7 papers)Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited StatesAustria
In The Last Decade
Christiane Theda
24 papers receiving 1.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
- Molecular Biology 774
- Genetics 520
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 181
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 172
- Clinical Biochemistry 158
Countries citing papers authored by Christiane Theda
This map shows the geographic impact of Christiane Theda's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christiane Theda with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christiane Theda more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Christiane Theda
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christiane Theda. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christiane Theda. The network helps show where Christiane Theda may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Christiane Theda
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Christiane Theda. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Christiane Theda based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Christiane Theda. Christiane Theda is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 109 | |
| 2 | 37 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 180 | |
| 6 | 19 | |
| 7 | 17 | |
| 8 | 48 | |
| 9 | 7 | |
| 10 | 3 | |
| 11 | 42 | |
| 12 | 83 | |
| 13 | 23 | |
| 14 | 11 | |
| 15 | 179 | |
| 16 | 42 | |
| 17 | 138 | |
| 18 | Analysis of phenotypic features and FGFR2 mutations in Apert syndrome. | 189 |
| 19 | 32 | |
| 20 | 81 |
About Christiane Theda
Christiane Theda is a scholar working on Clinical Biochemistry, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Emergency Medical Services, having authored 24 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (9 papers), Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors (7 papers) and Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Biochemistry (158 citations), Genetics (520 citations) and Molecular Biology (774 citations). Christiane Theda has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Ethylin Wang Jabs, Ann B. Moser, Gregory A. Meyers, Jeffrey M. Craig, Yuk Jing Loke, Pamela Leong, Anna Czajko, Ali Fatemi, Bela R. Turk and Craig R. Dufresne. Their work appears in journals such as Molecular and Cellular Biology, Annals of Neurology and Scientific Reports.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.