Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Digital photography with flash and no-flash image pairs
2004806 citationsManeesh Agrawala, Michael Cohen et al.profile →
Interactive digital photomontage
2004629 citationsAseem Agarwala, Maneesh Agrawala et al.profile →
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Cohen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Cohen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Cohen more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Cohen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Cohen. The network helps show where Michael Cohen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael Cohen
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael Cohen.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael Cohen based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Michael Cohen. Michael Cohen is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Cohen, Michael, et al.. (2008). “Roughometer”: Realtime Roughness Calculation and Profiling. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society.2 indexed citations
Cohen, Michael, et al.. (2001). Psychophysically-derived control of source range for the Pioneer Sound Field Controller. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society.2 indexed citations
13.
Cole, Ron, et al.. (1999). New tools for interactive speech and language training: Using animated conversational agents in the classrooms of profoundly deaf children..20 indexed citations
14.
Frith, Uta, et al.. (1997). Audiovisual speech perception in dyslexics: impaired unimodal perception but no audiovisual integration deficit.. AVSP. 85–88.2 indexed citations
Cohen, Michael, et al.. (1994). Real-time analysis-synthesis and intelligibility of talking faces.. SSW. 53–56.30 indexed citations
17.
Cohen, Michael, et al.. (1992). Design of Virtual Conferencing Environment in Audio Telecommunication. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society.1 indexed citations
18.
Cohen, Michael, et al.. (1992). Exocentric Control of Audio Imaging in Binaural Telecommunication. IEICE Transactions on Fundamentals of Electronics Communications and Computer Sciences. 75(2). 164–170.5 indexed citations
19.
Cohen, Michael, Horacio Franco, Nelson Morgan, David E. Rumelhart, & Victor Abrash. (1992). Context-Dependent Multiple Distribution Phonetic Modeling with MLPs. Neural Information Processing Systems. 5. 649–657.18 indexed citations
20.
Konig, Yochai, Nelson Morgan, Chuck Wooters, et al.. (1992). Modeling Consistency in a Speaker Independent Continuous Speech Recognition System. Neural Information Processing Systems. 682–687.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.