Christian Peter

826 citations
23 papers · 319 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Christian Peter

22 papers receiving 292 citations

Peers

Christian Peter
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Human-Computer Interaction 78
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 102
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 11
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 95
  • Social Psychology 82
Replace Tan Tang with:
Tan Tang China
Lyndsay Williams United Kingdom
Niamh Caprani Ireland
Kavous Salehzadeh Niksirat Switzerland
Diana Löffler Germany
Debaleena Chattopadhyay United States
Gavin Smyth United Kingdom
Leo Galway United Kingdom
Luís Macedo Portugal
Nadia Mana Italy
Christian Peter relative to Tan Tang China Tan Tang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×
Tan Tang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Christian Peter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Christian Peter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christian Peter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christian Peter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Christian Peter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christian Peter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christian Peter. The network helps show where Christian Peter may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside Christian Peter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Christian Peter Line = papers co-authored together Christian Peter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200687
2 200844
3 201023
4 201321
5 201118
6 201118
7 200813
8 200913
9 200811
10 200710
11 20039
12 20088
13 20127
14 20097
15 20077
16 20107
17 20096
18
Sensing Mood to Counteract Dementia
20074
19 20122
20 20122

About Christian Peter

Christian Peter is a scholar working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Human-Computer Interaction, Social Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Demography, having authored 23 papers that have together received 319 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems (9 papers), Technology Use by Older Adults (5 papers), Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (5 papers), Emotion and Mood Recognition (5 papers), Social Robot Interaction and HRI (4 papers), Color perception and design (3 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (3 papers) and Human Mobility and Location-Based Analysis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (78 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (102 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (11 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (95 citations) and Social Psychology (82 citations). Christian Peter has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Austria and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Russell Beale, Gerald Bieber, Bodo Urban, John Waterworth, Soledad Ballesteros, Elizabeth A. Crane, N. Sadat Shami, Hans‐Rüdiger Pfister, Mayela Zamora and Lesley Axelrod. Their work appears in journals such as Interacting with Computers, Journal on Multimodal User Interfaces, Sensor Review, Electronic workshops in computing and Fraunhofer-Publica (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact