Chris Kelso

994 total citations
24 papers, 614 citations indexed

About

Chris Kelso is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. According to data from OpenAlex, Chris Kelso has authored 24 papers receiving a total of 614 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 22 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 9 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics and 6 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. Recurrent topics in Chris Kelso's work include Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena (20 papers), Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (16 papers) and Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (8 papers). Chris Kelso is often cited by papers focused on Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena (20 papers), Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (16 papers) and Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (8 papers). Chris Kelso collaborates with scholars based in United States, Sweden and Brazil. Chris Kelso's co-authors include Farinaldo S. Queiroz, Dan Hooper, Dan Hooper, Matthew R. Buckley, J. I. Collar, J. Hall, Katherine Freese, Stefano Profumo, R. Martı́nez and H. N. Long and has published in prestigious journals such as The Astrophysical Journal, Physics Letters B and Journal of the Optical Society of America A.

In The Last Decade

Chris Kelso

24 papers receiving 610 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Chris Kelso United States 12 582 385 72 20 16 24 614
Peizhi Du United States 11 327 0.6× 240 0.6× 28 0.4× 10 0.5× 12 0.8× 25 380
Sebastian Baum United States 12 432 0.7× 297 0.8× 66 0.9× 12 0.6× 11 0.7× 32 475
P. Brun France 6 385 0.7× 254 0.7× 32 0.4× 7 0.3× 16 1.0× 12 411
Jae Hyeok Chang United States 9 565 1.0× 429 1.1× 72 1.0× 7 0.3× 5 0.3× 13 621
Pier Paolo Giardino United States 15 740 1.3× 215 0.6× 25 0.3× 15 0.8× 14 0.9× 31 760
Thomas Schwetz Germany 15 947 1.6× 628 1.6× 155 2.2× 6 0.3× 20 1.3× 20 971
Matthew Low United States 11 619 1.1× 233 0.6× 34 0.5× 35 1.8× 9 0.6× 23 673
Sophie Renner United Kingdom 11 720 1.2× 209 0.5× 45 0.6× 35 1.8× 8 0.5× 14 728
Jusak Tandean Taiwan 17 1.0k 1.7× 403 1.0× 47 0.7× 24 1.2× 10 0.6× 66 1.0k
Mathew McCaskey United States 8 785 1.3× 530 1.4× 24 0.3× 16 0.8× 10 0.6× 9 794

Countries citing papers authored by Chris Kelso

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chris Kelso's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chris Kelso with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chris Kelso more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chris Kelso

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chris Kelso. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chris Kelso. The network helps show where Chris Kelso may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Chris Kelso

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Chris Kelso. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Chris Kelso based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Chris Kelso. Chris Kelso is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Baum, Sebastian, Katherine Freese, & Chris Kelso. (2018). Dark Matter implications of DAMA/LIBRA-phase2 results. Physics Letters B. 789. 262–269. 28 indexed citations
2.
Kelso, Chris, Christopher Savage, Pearl Sandick, Katherine Freese, & Paolo Gondolo. (2018). Examining the time dependence of DAMA’s modulation amplitude. The European Physical Journal C. 78(3). 2 indexed citations
3.
Kelso, Chris, Jason Kumar, Danny Marfatia, & Pearl Sandick. (2018). Directly detecting isospin-violating dark matter. Physical review. D. 97(5). 2 indexed citations
4.
Kelso, Chris, et al.. (2017). Study of dark matter and QCD-charged mediators in the quasidegenerate regime. Physical review. D. 96(11). 3 indexed citations
5.
Kelso, Chris, Christopher Savage, Monica Valluri, et al.. (2016). The impact of baryons on the direct detection of dark matter. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics. 2016(8). 71–71. 42 indexed citations
6.
Kelso, Chris & Dan Hooper. (2016). Prospects For Identifying Dark Matter With CoGeNT. 1 indexed citations
7.
Kelso, Chris. (2016). A maximum likelihood analysis of the CoGeNT public dataset. AIP conference proceedings. 1743. 20006–20006. 1 indexed citations
8.
Kelso, Chris, Jason Kumar, Pearl Sandick, & Patrick Stengel. (2015). Charged mediators in dark matter scattering with nuclei and the strangeness content of nucleons. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 91(5). 11 indexed citations
9.
Kelso, Chris, et al.. (2014). MSSM dark matter and a light slepton sector: The incredible bulk. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 90(9). 21 indexed citations
10.
Kelso, Chris. (2014). Closing supersymmetric resonance regions with direct detection experiments. AIP conference proceedings. 362–368. 1 indexed citations
11.
Kelso, Chris, H. N. Long, R. Martı́nez, & Farinaldo S. Queiroz. (2014). Connection ofg−2μ, electroweak, dark matter, and collider constraints on 331 models. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 90(11). 63 indexed citations
12.
Kelso, Chris, Stefano Profumo, & Farinaldo S. Queiroz. (2013). Nonthermal WIMPs as “dark radiation” in light of ATACAMA, SPT, WMAP9, and Planck. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 88(2). 23 indexed citations
13.
Hooper, Dan, Chris Kelso, & Farinaldo S. Queiroz. (2013). Stringent constraints on the dark matter annihilation cross section from the region of the Galactic Center. Astroparticle Physics. 46. 55–70. 109 indexed citations
14.
Hooper, Dan, Chris Kelso, Pearl Sandick, & Wei Xue. (2013). Closing supersymmetric resonance regions with direct detection experiments. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 88(1). 17 indexed citations
15.
Kelso, Chris, Pearl Sandick, & Christopher Savage. (2013). Lowering the threshold in the DAMA dark matter search. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics. 2013(9). 22–22. 8 indexed citations
16.
Hooper, Dan & Chris Kelso. (2012). Implications of a largeBs→μ+μ−branching fraction for the minimal supersymmetric standard model. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 85(9). 2 indexed citations
17.
Hooper, Dan & Chris Kelso. (2011). Implications of CoGeNT’s new results for dark matter. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 84(8). 38 indexed citations
18.
Hooper, Dan, et al.. (2010). Consistent dark matter interpretation for CoGeNT and DAMA/LIBRA. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 82(12). 98 indexed citations
19.
Gnedin, Nickolay Y., E. Baker, Thomas J. Bethell, et al.. (2003). Linear Gas Dynamics in the Expanding Universe. The Astrophysical Journal. 583(2). 525–528. 16 indexed citations
20.
Kelso, Chris, et al.. (2001). Integral equations applied to wave propagation in two dimensions: modeling the tip of a near-field scanning optical microscope. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 18(8). 1993–1993. 6 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Peizhi Du Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Sebastian Baum Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by P. Brun Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jae Hyeok Chang Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Pier Paolo Giardino Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Thomas Schwetz Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Matthew Low Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Sophie Renner Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jusak Tandean Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Mathew McCaskey
Rankless by CCL
2026