Patrick Stengel

419 total citations
24 papers, 253 citations indexed

About

Patrick Stengel is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. According to data from OpenAlex, Patrick Stengel has authored 24 papers receiving a total of 253 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 24 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 15 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics and 3 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. Recurrent topics in Patrick Stengel's work include Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena (24 papers), Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (17 papers) and Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (15 papers). Patrick Stengel is often cited by papers focused on Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena (24 papers), Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (17 papers) and Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (15 papers). Patrick Stengel collaborates with scholars based in United States, Sweden and Italy. Patrick Stengel's co-authors include Katherine Freese, Sebastian Baum, Jason Kumar, Luca Visinelli, M. Górski, A. K. Drukier, Pearl Sandick, Evangelos I. Sfakianakis, Chris Kelso and T. Edwards and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Physics Letters B.

In The Last Decade

Patrick Stengel

24 papers receiving 251 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Patrick Stengel United States 11 233 151 21 13 6 24 253
Kyrylo Bondarenko Netherlands 9 321 1.4× 156 1.0× 24 1.1× 6 0.5× 20 352
Neng-Hui Liao China 11 272 1.2× 281 1.9× 15 0.7× 4 0.3× 31 346
Ronnie Jansson Germany 3 196 0.8× 141 0.9× 5 0.2× 6 0.5× 4 229
Michela D’Onofrio Finland 4 344 1.5× 257 1.7× 21 1.0× 4 0.3× 5 372
V. Kopenkin Japan 6 114 0.5× 55 0.4× 7 0.3× 8 0.6× 25 137
T. I. Rashba Russia 14 423 1.8× 102 0.7× 24 1.1× 8 0.6× 24 452
Eugenio Ursino United States 9 108 0.5× 208 1.4× 12 0.6× 8 0.6× 13 218
Satomi Okada United States 11 386 1.7× 233 1.5× 12 0.6× 3 0.2× 1 0.2× 21 397
Rome Samanta India 11 257 1.1× 274 1.8× 13 0.6× 9 0.7× 28 356
Arun M. Thalapillil India 9 254 1.1× 131 0.9× 15 0.7× 2 0.2× 20 277

Countries citing papers authored by Patrick Stengel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Patrick Stengel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Patrick Stengel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Patrick Stengel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Patrick Stengel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Patrick Stengel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Patrick Stengel. The network helps show where Patrick Stengel may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Patrick Stengel

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Patrick Stengel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Patrick Stengel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Patrick Stengel. Patrick Stengel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Dutta, Bhaskar, Tathagata Ghosh, Jason Kumar, et al.. (2024). Machine learning techniques for intermediate mass gap lepton partner searches at the large hadron collider. Physical review. D. 109(7). 1 indexed citations
2.
Stengel, Patrick, et al.. (2024). Constraining UV freeze-in of light relics with current and next-generation CMB observations. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics. 2024(10). 106–106. 2 indexed citations
3.
Freese, Katherine, et al.. (2023). Primordial non-Gaussianity from the effects of the Standard Model Higgs during reheating after inflation. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics. 2023(3). 33–33. 3 indexed citations
4.
Freese, Katherine, et al.. (2022). Neutrino point source searches for dark matter spikes. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics. 2022(8). 65–65. 4 indexed citations
5.
Stengel, Patrick, et al.. (2022). Minimal dark matter model for muon g2 with scalar lepton partners up to the TeV scale. Physical review. D. 105(7). 4 indexed citations
6.
Baum, Sebastian, Patrick Stengel, A. Ferrari, et al.. (2020). Measuring Changes in the Atmospheric Neutrino Rate over Gigayear Timescales. Physical Review Letters. 125(23). 231802–231802. 10 indexed citations
7.
Baum, Sebastian, Pearl Sandick, & Patrick Stengel. (2020). Hunting for scalar lepton partners at future electron colliders. Physical review. D. 102(1). 10 indexed citations
8.
Baum, Sebastian, T. Edwards, Bradley J. Kavanagh, et al.. (2020). Paleodetectors for Galactic supernova neutrinos. Physical review. D. 101(10). 14 indexed citations
9.
Baum, Sebastian, A. K. Drukier, Katherine Freese, M. Górski, & Patrick Stengel. (2020). Searching for dark matter with paleo-detectors. Physics Letters B. 803. 135325–135325. 26 indexed citations
10.
Dienes, Keith R., Jason Kumar, Patrick Stengel, & Brooks Thomas. (2019). Cosmological constraints on unstable particles: Numerical bounds and analytic approximations. Physical review. D. 99(4). 8 indexed citations
11.
Drukier, A. K., Sebastian Baum, Katherine Freese, M. Górski, & Patrick Stengel. (2019). Paleo-detectors: Searching for dark matter with ancient minerals. Physical review. D. 99(4). 23 indexed citations
12.
Freese, Katherine, Evangelos I. Sfakianakis, Patrick Stengel, & Luca Visinelli. (2018). The Higgs boson can delay reheating after inflation. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics. 2018(5). 67–67. 24 indexed citations
13.
Kelso, Chris, et al.. (2017). Study of dark matter and QCD-charged mediators in the quasidegenerate regime. Physical review. D. 96(11). 3 indexed citations
14.
Dutta, Bhaskar, Tathagata Ghosh, Jason Kumar, et al.. (2017). Probing squeezed bino-slepton spectra with the Large Hadron Collider. Physical review. D. 96(7). 9 indexed citations
15.
Baum, Sebastian, Luca Visinelli, Katherine Freese, & Patrick Stengel. (2017). Dark matter capture, subdominant WIMPs, and neutrino observatories. Physical review. D. 95(4). 22 indexed citations
16.
Fernandez, Nicolas, I. S. Seong, & Patrick Stengel. (2016). Constraints on light dark matter from single-photon decays of heavy quarkonium. Physical review. D. 93(5). 4 indexed citations
17.
Stengel, Patrick & Xerxes Tata. (2015). Same-sign Higgsino production at the CERN LHC: How not to hunt for natural supersymmetry. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 92(11). 1 indexed citations
18.
Kelso, Chris, Jason Kumar, Pearl Sandick, & Patrick Stengel. (2015). Charged mediators in dark matter scattering with nuclei and the strangeness content of nucleons. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 91(5). 11 indexed citations
19.
Fernandez, Nicolas, Jason Kumar, I. S. Seong, & Patrick Stengel. (2014). Complementary constraints on light dark matter from heavy quarkonium decays. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 90(1). 13 indexed citations
20.
Kumar, Jason & Patrick Stengel. (2014). WIMPy leptogenesis with absorptive final state interactions. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 89(5). 19 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026