Pearl Sandick

1.1k total citations
47 papers, 701 citations indexed

About

Pearl Sandick is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. According to data from OpenAlex, Pearl Sandick has authored 47 papers receiving a total of 701 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 44 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 32 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics and 6 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. Recurrent topics in Pearl Sandick's work include Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena (40 papers), Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (28 papers) and Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (27 papers). Pearl Sandick is often cited by papers focused on Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena (40 papers), Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (28 papers) and Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (27 papers). Pearl Sandick collaborates with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and France. Pearl Sandick's co-authors include Keith A. Olive, Barmak Shams Es Haghi, Paolo Gondolo, John Ellis, Kuver Sinha, Jason Kumar, John Ellis, Chris Kelso, Feng Luo and Takahiro Yamamoto and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, The Astrophysical Journal and Physics Letters B.

In The Last Decade

Pearl Sandick

43 papers receiving 692 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Pearl Sandick United States 16 621 528 63 18 11 47 701
Ken’ichi Saikawa Japan 10 590 1.0× 516 1.0× 91 1.4× 19 1.1× 7 0.6× 15 632
Francesco D’Eramo United States 19 974 1.6× 623 1.2× 46 0.7× 11 0.6× 11 1.0× 43 1000
Raghuveer Garani Italy 11 377 0.6× 340 0.6× 116 1.8× 17 0.9× 10 0.9× 18 424
Nikita Blinov United States 16 888 1.4× 632 1.2× 66 1.0× 25 1.4× 5 0.5× 29 947
Maíra Dutra France 7 696 1.1× 562 1.1× 64 1.0× 11 0.6× 8 0.7× 9 719
William DeRocco United States 9 367 0.6× 314 0.6× 70 1.1× 14 0.8× 7 0.6× 16 436
Oscar Macías Japan 14 805 1.3× 639 1.2× 40 0.6× 24 1.3× 5 0.5× 30 869
Anupam Ray United States 9 355 0.6× 409 0.8× 58 0.9× 8 0.4× 6 0.5× 19 481
Miguel Escudero United Kingdom 21 980 1.6× 694 1.3× 48 0.8× 19 1.1× 6 0.5× 30 1.1k
Xun-Jie Xu China 18 799 1.3× 243 0.5× 35 0.6× 18 1.0× 8 0.7× 56 837

Countries citing papers authored by Pearl Sandick

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Pearl Sandick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Pearl Sandick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pearl Sandick more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Pearl Sandick

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Pearl Sandick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Pearl Sandick. The network helps show where Pearl Sandick may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Pearl Sandick

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Pearl Sandick. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Pearl Sandick based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Pearl Sandick. Pearl Sandick is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Anderson, K. S. J., et al.. (2025). Blue loops, Cepheids, and forays into axions. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics. 2025(4). 83–83.
2.
Kumar, Jason, et al.. (2025). Tools for probing new physics with newly discovered gamma-ray targets. Physical review. D. 111(6).
3.
Rott, C., et al.. (2024). Neutrinos for TeV neutralinos. Physical review. D. 109(7). 2 indexed citations
4.
Dutta, Bhaskar, Tathagata Ghosh, Jason Kumar, et al.. (2024). Machine learning techniques for intermediate mass gap lepton partner searches at the large hadron collider. Physical review. D. 109(7). 1 indexed citations
5.
Bromley, Benjamin C., Pearl Sandick, & Barmak Shams Es Haghi. (2024). Supermassive black hole binaries in ultralight dark matter. Physical review. D. 110(2). 10 indexed citations
6.
Kumar, Jason, et al.. (2024). Are there correlations in the HAWC and IceCube high energy skymaps outside the Galactic plane?. Physical review. D. 110(2). 2 indexed citations
7.
Chen, Yifan, Bartosz Fornal, Pearl Sandick, et al.. (2023). Earth shielding and daily modulation from electrophilic boosted dark particles. Physical review. D. 107(3). 9 indexed citations
8.
Kumar, Jason, et al.. (2023). Constraining p-wave dark matter annihilation with gamma-ray observations of M87. Physical review. D. 108(10). 3 indexed citations
9.
Barthelemy, Ramón S., et al.. (2023). Graduate program reform in one department of physics and astronomy: From tragedy to more progressive policies and an evolving culture. Physical Review Physics Education Research. 19(1). 7 indexed citations
10.
Gondolo, Paolo, Pearl Sandick, Barmak Shams Es Haghi, & Eli Visbal. (2022). Reionization in the Light of Dark Stars. The Astrophysical Journal. 935(1). 11–11. 3 indexed citations
11.
Arbey, Alexandre, Jérémy Auffinger, Pearl Sandick, Barmak Shams Es Haghi, & Kuver Sinha. (2021). Precision calculation of dark radiation from spinning primordial black holes and early matter-dominated eras. Physical review. D. 103(12). 47 indexed citations
12.
Fornal, Bartosz, Pearl Sandick, Jing Shu, Meng Su, & Yue Zhao. (2020). Boosted Dark Matter Interpretation of the XENON1T Excess. Physical Review Letters. 125(16). 161804–161804. 61 indexed citations
13.
Gondolo, Paolo, Pearl Sandick, & Barmak Shams Es Haghi. (2020). Effects of primordial black holes on dark matter models. Physical review. D. 102(9). 92 indexed citations
14.
Elagin, A., Jason Kumar, Pearl Sandick, & Fei Teng. (2017). Prospects for detecting a net photon circular polarization produced by decaying dark matter. Physical review. D. 96(9). 7 indexed citations
15.
Kelso, Chris, et al.. (2017). Study of dark matter and QCD-charged mediators in the quasidegenerate regime. Physical review. D. 96(11). 3 indexed citations
16.
Dutta, Bhaskar, Tathagata Ghosh, Jason Kumar, et al.. (2017). Probing squeezed bino-slepton spectra with the Large Hadron Collider. Physical review. D. 96(7). 9 indexed citations
17.
Ellis, John, Jason L. Evans, Feng Luo, et al.. (2016). Beyond the CMSSM without an accelerator: proton decay and direct dark matter detection. The European Physical Journal C. 76(1). 8–8. 33 indexed citations
18.
Sandick, Pearl, Juerg Diemand, Katherine Freese, & Douglas Spolyar. (2012). Gamma-ray constraints on the first stars from annihilation of light WIMPs. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 85(8). 5 indexed citations
19.
Kumar, Jason, et al.. (2011). Detection prospects for Majorana fermion WIMPless dark matter. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 84(1). 8 indexed citations
20.
Sandick, Pearl, Keith A. Olive, F. Daigne, & Elisabeth Vangioni. (2006). Gravitational waves from the first stars. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 73(10). 37 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026