Dan Hooper

441 total citations
11 papers, 299 citations indexed

About

Dan Hooper is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. According to data from OpenAlex, Dan Hooper has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 299 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 5 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics and 3 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. Recurrent topics in Dan Hooper's work include Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena (11 papers), Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (7 papers) and Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena (5 papers). Dan Hooper is often cited by papers focused on Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena (11 papers), Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (7 papers) and Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena (5 papers). Dan Hooper collaborates with scholars based in United States and France. Dan Hooper's co-authors include Matthew R. Buckley, Chris Kelso, Tim Linden, Jason Kumar, Ethan T. Neil, P. Perez, T. Jeltema, Tracy R. Slatyer, Stefano Profumo and Tim M. P. Tait and has published in prestigious journals such as Physics Letters B, Comptes Rendus Physique and Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology.

In The Last Decade

Dan Hooper

11 papers receiving 299 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Dan Hooper United States	8	295	176	31	7	4	11	299
Daniel J. Phalen United States	8	372 1.3×	226 1.3×	34 1.1×	7 1.0×	6 1.5×	15	378
O. Mansutti Italy	5	259 0.9×	128 0.7×	27 0.9×	8 1.1×	3 0.8×	16	278
Marco Hufnagel Germany	7	293 1.0×	207 1.2×	26 0.8×	6 0.9×	2 0.5×	11	298
Giuseppe Lucente Italy	12	364 1.2×	207 1.2×	37 1.2×	3 0.4×	4 1.0×	21	383
M. Battaglia France	2	181 0.6×	150 0.9×	23 0.7×	5 0.7×	3 0.8×	2	197
Rakhi Mahbubani Switzerland	11	459 1.6×	228 1.3×	18 0.6×	5 0.7×	11 2.8×	16	467
Junhai Kang United States	7	459 1.6×	232 1.3×	18 0.6×	6 0.9×	6 1.5×	8	467
Huangyu Xiao United States	10	246 0.8×	241 1.4×	18 0.6×	6 0.9×	4 1.0×	18	280
Kyrylo Bondarenko Netherlands	9	321 1.1×	156 0.9×	24 0.8×	4 0.6×	2 0.5×	20	352
Grigory Ovanesyan United States	12	429 1.5×	137 0.8×	27 0.9×	2 0.3×	5 1.3×	20	438

Countries citing papers authored by Dan Hooper

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dan Hooper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dan Hooper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dan Hooper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dan Hooper

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dan Hooper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dan Hooper. The network helps show where Dan Hooper may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dan Hooper

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dan Hooper. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dan Hooper based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Dan Hooper. Dan Hooper is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

11 of 11 papers shown

Buckley, Matthew R., Dan Hooper, & Jason Kumar. (2013). Phenomenology of Dirac neutralino dark matter. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 88(6). 35 indexed citations

Tait, Tim M. P. & Dan Hooper. (2012). Theories of particle dark matter. Comptes Rendus Physique. 13(6-7). 719–723. 3 indexed citations

Hooper, Dan, et al.. (2012). The isotropic radio background and annihilating dark matter. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 86(10). 25 indexed citations

Hooper, Dan & Tim Linden. (2012). Are lines from unassociated gamma-ray sources evidence for dark matter annihilation?. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 86(8). 17 indexed citations

Buckley, Matthew R. & Dan Hooper. (2012). Implications of a 130 GeV gamma-ray line for dark matter. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 86(4). 48 indexed citations

Kelso, Chris, Dan Hooper, & Matthew R. Buckley. (2012). Toward a consistent picture for CRESST, CoGeNT, and DAMA. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 85(4). 63 indexed citations

Hooper, Dan & Chris Kelso. (2011). Implications of CoGeNT’s new results for dark matter. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 84(8). 38 indexed citations

Buckley, Matthew R., P. Perez, Dan Hooper, & Ethan T. Neil. (2011). Dark forces at the Tevatron. Physics Letters B. 702(4). 256–259. 23 indexed citations

Buckley, Matthew R. & Dan Hooper. (2010). Dark matter subhalos in the Fermi first source catalog. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 82(6). 42 indexed citations

10.

Buckley, Matthew R. & Dan Hooper. (2010). Dark Matter Subhalos In the Fermi First Source Catalog. arXiv (Cornell University). 115. 2 indexed citations

11.

Gunion, John F., Dan Hooper, & Bob McElrath. (2005). Light Neutralino Dark Matter in the NMSSM. University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas). 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact