Chris Bart

952 total citations
22 papers, 675 citations indexed

About

Chris Bart is a scholar working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Strategy and Management and Management Information Systems. According to data from OpenAlex, Chris Bart has authored 22 papers receiving a total of 675 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, 9 papers in Strategy and Management and 9 papers in Management Information Systems. Recurrent topics in Chris Bart's work include Organizational Strategy and Culture (9 papers), ERP Systems Implementation and Impact (7 papers) and Information Technology Governance and Strategy (7 papers). Chris Bart is often cited by papers focused on Organizational Strategy and Culture (9 papers), ERP Systems Implementation and Impact (7 papers) and Information Technology Governance and Strategy (7 papers). Chris Bart collaborates with scholars based in Canada, United States and Malaysia. Chris Bart's co-authors include Ofir Turel, Nick Bontis, Hongjin Zhu, Pengji Wang, Lorne D. Booker, Hazel Melanie Ramos, Ken Deal, Peng Liu, Mark C. Baetz and S. Mark Pancer and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Business Ethics, Journal of Product Innovation Management and European Journal of Information Systems.

In The Last Decade

Chris Bart

22 papers receiving 603 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Chris Bart Canada 12 251 220 173 172 96 22 675
Gianluca Ginesti Italy 14 300 1.2× 58 0.3× 368 2.1× 109 0.6× 54 0.6× 35 669
Dzidziso Samuel Kamuriwo United Kingdom 10 232 0.9× 101 0.5× 266 1.5× 77 0.4× 88 0.9× 21 589
Ansgar Richter United Kingdom 12 374 1.5× 77 0.3× 237 1.4× 173 1.0× 29 0.3× 43 676
Albertina Paula Monteiro Portugal 13 281 1.1× 81 0.4× 162 0.9× 60 0.3× 30 0.3× 45 564
Ioannis C. Thanos Greece 16 423 1.7× 58 0.3× 259 1.5× 179 1.0× 18 0.2× 37 736
Tony Hines United Kingdom 15 142 0.6× 172 0.8× 318 1.8× 65 0.4× 23 0.2× 31 594
Darush Yazdanfar Sweden 17 247 1.0× 68 0.3× 737 4.3× 109 0.6× 33 0.3× 58 1.1k
Andy Wu United States 12 211 0.8× 87 0.4× 225 1.3× 116 0.7× 36 0.4× 27 671
Mohamed A. K. Basuony Egypt 17 323 1.3× 91 0.4× 435 2.5× 32 0.2× 59 0.6× 38 741
Dewi Fariha Abdullah Malaysia 10 365 1.5× 43 0.2× 415 2.4× 76 0.4× 111 1.2× 24 744

Countries citing papers authored by Chris Bart

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chris Bart's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chris Bart with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chris Bart more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chris Bart

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chris Bart. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chris Bart. The network helps show where Chris Bart may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Chris Bart

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Chris Bart. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Chris Bart based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Chris Bart. Chris Bart is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Khanin, Dmitry, et al.. (2020). The possible pitfalls of boards’ engagement in the strategic management process. Review of Managerial Science. 15(4). 1071–1093. 6 indexed citations
2.
Turel, Ofir, Peng Liu, & Chris Bart. (2019). Board-Level IT Governance. IT Professional. 21(2). 58–65. 11 indexed citations
3.
Turel, Ofir, et al.. (2019). Board IT Governance in Context: Considering Governance Style and Environmental Dynamism Contingencies. Information Systems Management. 36(3). 212–227. 16 indexed citations
4.
Turel, Ofir, et al.. (2019). Is board IT governance a silver bullet? A capability complementarity and shaping view. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems. 33. 32–46. 27 indexed citations
5.
Booker, Lorne D., et al.. (2015). Mission statements and performance in non-profit organisations. Corporate Governance. 15(5). 759–774. 28 indexed citations
6.
Zhu, Hongjin, Pengji Wang, & Chris Bart. (2014). Board Processes, Board Strategic Involvement, and Organizational Performance in For-profit and Non-profit Organizations. Journal of Business Ethics. 136(2). 311–328. 50 indexed citations
7.
Turel, Ofir & Chris Bart. (2013). Board-level IT governance and organizational performance. European Journal of Information Systems. 23(2). 223–239. 80 indexed citations
8.
Bart, Chris, et al.. (2013). Why women make better directors. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics. 8(1). 93–93. 144 indexed citations
9.
Bart, Chris, Yee‐Ching Lilian Chan, & Kiridaran Kanagaretnam. (2011). What Questions Do Board Members in Public Service Organizations Ask about Executive Compensation?. Accounting Perspectives. 10(2). 83–108. 3 indexed citations
10.
Bart, Chris & Ofir Turel. (2010). IT and the Board of Directors: An Empirical Investigation into the “Governance Questions” Canadian Board Members Ask about IT. Journal of Information Systems. 24(2). 147–172. 56 indexed citations
11.
Bart, Chris. (2009). An analysis of Canadian Audit Committee charters. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics. 5(1/2). 98–98. 2 indexed citations
12.
Bart, Chris & Ofir Turel. (2009). The role of the board in IT governance: current and desired oversight practices. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics. 4(4). 316–316. 9 indexed citations
13.
Bart, Chris. (2007). A comparative analysis of mission statement content in secular and faith‐based hospitals. Journal of Intellectual Capital. 8(4). 682–694. 40 indexed citations
14.
Bart, Chris. (2007). Improving the board's involvement in corporate strategy: directors speak out. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics. 3(4). 382–382. 2 indexed citations
15.
Bart, Chris. (2006). An empirical examination of the content and composition of Board Charters. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics. 2(3/4). 198–198. 5 indexed citations
16.
Bart, Chris & Ken Deal. (2006). The governance role of the board in corporate strategy: a comparison of board practices in 'for profit' and 'not for profit' organisations. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics. 2(1/2). 2–2. 10 indexed citations
17.
Bart, Chris, et al.. (2006). The Performance Impact of Content and Process in Product Innovation Charters. Journal of Product Innovation Management. 24(1). 3–19. 26 indexed citations
18.
Bart, Chris. (2004). Innovation, mission statements and learning. International Journal of Technology Management. 27(6/7). 544–544. 23 indexed citations
19.
Bart, Chris. (2004). The governance role of the board in corporate strategy: an initial progress report. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics. 1(2/3). 111–111. 7 indexed citations
20.
Bart, Chris & Nick Bontis. (2003). Distinguishing between the board and management in company mission. Journal of Intellectual Capital. 4(3). 361–381. 46 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026