Regulatory Peptides

5.7k papers and 125.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 5.7k papers published in Regulatory Peptides in the last decades have received a total of 125.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Regulatory Peptides usually cover Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (2.8k papers), Molecular Biology (2.2k papers) and Surgery (1.1k papers) specifically the topics of Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (2.6k papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (1.3k papers) and Regulation of Appetite and Obesity (645 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Regulatory Peptides are Rolf Mentlein, R. Håkanson, F. Sundler, Jens J. Holst, Dan Larhammar, Akira Arimura, Eva Ekblad, Carlo Alberto Maggi, J. Michael Conlon and Claes Wahlestedt.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Regulatory Peptides

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Regulatory Peptides. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Regulatory Peptides.

Countries where authors publish in Regulatory Peptides

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Regulatory Peptides. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Regulatory Peptides with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Regulatory Peptides more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025