Sarah Wakefield
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Social Psychology
- General Health Professions
- Co-authors
- Markus ReuberKirsty HarknessD. BlackburnJaime DelgadilloStephen KellettDanielle JonesMelanie Simmonds‐BuckleyPaul Drew
- Topics
- Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (5 papers)Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (3 papers)Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare (2 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & PsychiatryPatient Education and CounselingBritish Journal of Clinical Psychology
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesItaly
In The Last Decade
Sarah Wakefield
11 papers receiving 371 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
- Psychiatry and Mental health 163
- Clinical Psychology 114
- Cognitive Neuroscience 87
- Social Psychology 80
- General Health Professions 79
Countries citing papers authored by Sarah Wakefield
This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah Wakefield's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah Wakefield with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah Wakefield more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah Wakefield
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah Wakefield. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah Wakefield. The network helps show where Sarah Wakefield may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sarah Wakefield
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sarah Wakefield. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sarah Wakefield based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sarah Wakefield. Sarah Wakefield is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10 | |
| 2 | 123 | |
| 3 | 28 | |
| 4 | 29 | |
| 5 | 25 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 67 | |
| 9 | 67 | |
| 10 | 20 | |
| 11 | 4 |
About Sarah Wakefield
Sarah Wakefield is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental health and Sensory Systems, having authored 11 papers that have together received 376 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (5 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (3 papers) and Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (163 citations), Applied Psychology (43 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (74 citations). Sarah Wakefield has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Markus Reuber, Kirsty Harkness, D. Blackburn, Jaime Delgadillo, Stephen Kellett, Danielle Jones, Melanie Simmonds‐Buckley, Paul Drew, Annalena Venneri and Christopher Elsey. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, Patient Education and Counseling and British Journal of Clinical Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.