Chloe M. Hall

1.0k total citations
9 papers, 250 citations indexed

About

Chloe M. Hall is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cell Biology and Neurology. According to data from OpenAlex, Chloe M. Hall has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 250 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Molecular Biology, 3 papers in Cell Biology and 2 papers in Neurology. Recurrent topics in Chloe M. Hall's work include Cellular Mechanics and Interactions (3 papers), DNA Repair Mechanisms (2 papers) and Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (2 papers). Chloe M. Hall is often cited by papers focused on Cellular Mechanics and Interactions (3 papers), DNA Repair Mechanisms (2 papers) and Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (2 papers). Chloe M. Hall collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and China. Chloe M. Hall's co-authors include Emad Moeendarbary, Graham K. Sheridan, Ali Akbar Alemrajabi, Mojtaba Azadi, Yousef Javanmardi, Umber Cheema, Satya Khuon, Teng‐Leong Chew, Dong Li and Aaron B. Taylor and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature Communications, Nano Letters and Journal of Neurochemistry.

In The Last Decade

Chloe M. Hall

9 papers receiving 249 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Chloe M. Hall United Kingdom	5	100	74	59	42	39	9	250
Cátia S. Janota Portugal	8	140 1.4×	30 0.4×	72 1.2×	166 4.0×	22 0.6×	8	326
Roger Sauser Switzerland	9	167 1.7×	91 1.2×	136 2.3×	171 4.1×	63 1.6×	9	463
Matthew J. Farrar United States	6	55 0.6×	131 1.8×	29 0.5×	69 1.6×	96 2.5×	9	386
Tomas Andersen France	7	144 1.4×	49 0.7×	42 0.7×	125 3.0×	17 0.4×	10	272
B Riederer Switzerland	4	235 2.4×	39 0.5×	58 1.0×	190 4.5×	74 1.9×	8	402
Paul T. Arsenovic United States	11	275 2.8×	61 0.8×	37 0.6×	243 5.8×	38 1.0×	13	438
Rita Pinto‐Costa Portugal	10	126 1.3×	14 0.2×	47 0.8×	97 2.3×	122 3.1×	13	334
Dana Bar-On Israel	7	113 1.1×	24 0.3×	53 0.9×	157 3.7×	69 1.8×	11	307
Kendra D. Nyberg United States	9	211 2.1×	241 3.3×	32 0.5×	98 2.3×	25 0.6×	11	453
Ruoqi Gao United States	10	76 0.8×	87 1.2×	49 0.8×	217 5.2×	123 3.2×	12	464

Countries citing papers authored by Chloe M. Hall

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chloe M. Hall's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chloe M. Hall with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chloe M. Hall more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chloe M. Hall

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chloe M. Hall. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chloe M. Hall. The network helps show where Chloe M. Hall may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Chloe M. Hall

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Chloe M. Hall. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Chloe M. Hall based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Chloe M. Hall. Chloe M. Hall is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

1.

Frit, Philippe, Nadia Barboule, Chloe M. Hall, et al.. (2025). Structural and functional insights into the interaction between Ku70/80 and Pol X family polymerases in NHEJ. Nature Communications. 16(1). 4208–4208. 2 indexed citations

2.

Stewart, Nicolas A., Myrthe Mampay, Chloe M. Hall, et al.. (2024). The sphingosine 1‐phosphate analogue, FTY720, modulates the lipidomic signature of the mouse hippocampus. Journal of Neurochemistry. 168(6). 1113–1142. 2 indexed citations

3.

Hall, Chloe M., et al.. (2023). Hippocampus of the APPNL–G–F mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease exhibits region-specific tissue softening concomitant with elevated astrogliosis. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience. 15. 1212212–1212212. 4 indexed citations

4.

Hall, Chloe M., et al.. (2023). Cold snapshots of DNA repair: Cryo-EM structures of DNA-PKcs and NHEJ machinery. Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology. 186. 1–13. 4 indexed citations

5.

Pape, Judith, et al.. (2022). Evaluating the Impact of a Biomimetic Mechanical Environment on Cancer Invasion and Matrix Remodeling. Advanced Healthcare Materials. 12(14). 18 indexed citations

6.

Jiang, Shenyi, Rui Wang, Chloe M. Hall, et al.. (2021). Knock-in models related to Alzheimer’s disease: synaptic transmission, plaques and the role of microglia. Molecular Neurodegeneration. 16(1). 47–47. 43 indexed citations

7.

Hall, Chloe M., Emad Moeendarbary, & Graham K. Sheridan. (2020). Mechanobiology of the brain in ageing and Alzheimer's disease. European Journal of Neuroscience. 53(12). 3851–3878. 87 indexed citations

8.

Alemrajabi, Ali Akbar, et al.. (2019). A new framework for characterization of poroelastic materials using indentation. Acta Biomaterialia. 102. 138–148. 45 indexed citations

9.

Colin‐York, Huw, Yousef Javanmardi, Di Li, et al.. (2019). Spatiotemporally Super-Resolved Volumetric Traction Force Microscopy. Nano Letters. 19(7). 4427–4434. 45 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact