Chi‐Wing Kong

1.7k citations
29 papers · 1.1k · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Chi‐Wing Kong

29 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Chi‐Wing Kong
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 314
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 228
  • Molecular Biology 742
  • Biomedical Engineering 342
  • Surgery 268
Replace Luke M. Judge with:
Luke M. Judge United States
Po-Lin So United States
Stefan Braam Netherlands
Jennie Yoo United States
Wesley L. McKeithan United States
Virginia Arechavala‐Gomeza United Kingdom
Mari Pekkanen-Mattila Finland
Marica Grs̆ković United States
Laurie B. Hazeltine United States
Martin Pešl Czechia
Chi‐Wing Kong relative to Luke M. Judge United States Luke M. Judge's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Luke M. Judge · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Chi‐Wing Kong

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chi‐Wing Kong's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chi‐Wing Kong with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chi‐Wing Kong more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chi‐Wing Kong

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chi‐Wing Kong. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chi‐Wing Kong. The network helps show where Chi‐Wing Kong may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Chi‐Wing Kong, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Chi‐Wing Kong Line = papers co-authored together Chi‐Wing Kong links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011145
2 2013144
3 2013114
4 201486
5 201677
6 201772
7 201161
8 201053
9 200947
10 201143
11 201634
12 201332
13 201631
14 201429
15 201524
16 201823
17 201321
18 200418
19 202013
20 200613

About Chi‐Wing Kong

Chi‐Wing Kong is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Biomedical Engineering and Surgery, having authored 29 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pluripotent Stem Cells Research (13 papers), Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (12 papers), 3D Printing in Biomedical Research (5 papers), Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (4 papers), Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies (4 papers), CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (4 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (3 papers) and Ion Transport and Channel Regulation (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (314 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (228 citations), Molecular Biology (742 citations), Biomedical Engineering (342 citations) and Surgery (268 citations). Chi‐Wing Kong has collaborated with scholars based in Hong Kong, United States and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Ronald A. Li, Ronald A. Li, Deborah K. Lieu, Roger J. Hajjar, Ji‐Dong Fu, Dong Sun, Shuxun Chen, Camie W. Chan, Gordon Keller and Lin Geng. Their work appears in journals such as Scientific Reports, Experimental Eye Research, Circulation Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology, Stem Cells and Development and Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact