Chi-Ming Kam

2.7k total citations · 1 hit paper
6 papers, 2.0k citations indexed

About

Chi-Ming Kam is a scholar working on Statistics and Probability, Pharmacology and Clinical Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Chi-Ming Kam has authored 6 papers receiving a total of 2.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Statistics and Probability, 1 paper in Pharmacology and 1 paper in Clinical Psychology. Recurrent topics in Chi-Ming Kam's work include Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference (3 papers), Statistical Methods and Inference (3 papers) and Advanced Causal Inference Techniques (2 papers). Chi-Ming Kam is often cited by papers focused on Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference (3 papers), Statistical Methods and Inference (3 papers) and Advanced Causal Inference Techniques (2 papers). Chi-Ming Kam collaborates with scholars based in Hong Kong, United States and China. Chi-Ming Kam's co-authors include Joseph L. Schafer, Linda M. Collins, Tatia M.C. Lee, Sandra Tsang, Chetwyn C. H. Chan, Andrew M. H. Siu and Junhong Yu and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Frontiers in Psychology and Psychological Methods.

In The Last Decade

Chi-Ming Kam

6 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

A comparison of inclusive and restrictive strategies in modern missing data procedures.

2001 1.8k citations Linda M. Collins, Joseph L. Schafer et al. Psychological Methods profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Chi-Ming Kam Hong Kong	6	561	478	299	297	296	6	2.0k
Francesca Chiesi Italy	27	389 0.7×	545 1.1×	252 0.8×	406 1.4×	359 1.2×	111	2.1k
Robert D. Gibbons United States	12	477 0.9×	654 1.4×	184 0.6×	335 1.1×	138 0.5×	14	2.4k
David Rogosa United States	16	354 0.6×	520 1.1×	359 1.2×	483 1.6×	486 1.6×	39	2.6k
Tom Loeys Belgium	29	388 0.7×	642 1.3×	338 1.1×	554 1.9×	109 0.4×	135	2.9k
Tammi Vacha‐Haase United States	22	205 0.4×	602 1.3×	331 1.1×	696 2.3×	359 1.2×	50	2.5k
Myeongsun Yoon United States	17	167 0.3×	373 0.8×	220 0.7×	237 0.8×	248 0.8×	38	1.4k
Sonya K. Sterba United States	26	553 1.0×	1.4k 2.8×	323 1.1×	474 1.6×	513 1.7×	60	2.9k
R. Philip Chalmers Canada	15	378 0.7×	519 1.1×	230 0.8×	382 1.3×	304 1.0×	31	2.4k
Rachel T. Fouladi United States	28	165 0.3×	536 1.1×	320 1.1×	395 1.3×	122 0.4×	67	2.8k
Holmes Finch United States	22	180 0.3×	380 0.8×	219 0.7×	568 1.9×	262 0.9×	62	2.0k

Countries citing papers authored by Chi-Ming Kam

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chi-Ming Kam's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chi-Ming Kam with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chi-Ming Kam more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chi-Ming Kam

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chi-Ming Kam. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chi-Ming Kam. The network helps show where Chi-Ming Kam may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Chi-Ming Kam

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Chi-Ming Kam. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Chi-Ming Kam based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Chi-Ming Kam. Chi-Ming Kam is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

6 of 6 papers shown

1.

Yu, Junhong, Chi-Ming Kam, & Tatia M.C. Lee. (2016). Better Working Memory and Motor Inhibition in Children Who Delayed Gratification. Frontiers in Psychology. 7. 1098–1098. 17 indexed citations

2.

Lee, Tatia M.C., et al.. (2013). Effects of chronic ketamine use on frontal and medial temporal cognition. Addictive Behaviors. 38(5). 2128–2132. 46 indexed citations

3.

Kam, Chi-Ming. (2011). Promoting social emotional learning in Chinese schools: a feasibility study of PATHS implementation in Hong Kong. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 3(1). 30–47. 5 indexed citations

4.

Collins, Linda M., Joseph L. Schafer, & Chi-Ming Kam. (2001). A comparison of inclusive and restrictive strategies in modern missing data procedures.. Psychological Methods. 6(4). 330–351. 105 indexed citations

5.

Collins, Linda M., Joseph L. Schafer, & Chi-Ming Kam. (2001). A comparison of inclusive and restrictive strategies in modern missing data procedures.. Psychological Methods. 6(4). 330–351. 13 indexed citations

6.

Collins, Linda M., Joseph L. Schafer, & Chi-Ming Kam. (2001). A comparison of inclusive and restrictive strategies in modern missing data procedures.. Psychological Methods. 6(4). 330–351. 1830 indexed citations breakdown →

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact