Li‐Jen Weng
- Sociology and Political Science top 2%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Education top 5%
- Health top 2%
- Co-authors
- Arthur R. JensenChi ChiaoAmanda BotticelloChung‐Ping ChengPo‐Hsien HuangPei–Ming YangHui‐Ching WuWL Chen
- Topics
- Psychometric Methodologies and Testing (8 papers)Health disparities and outcomes (6 papers)Advanced Statistical Modeling Techniques (5 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaBMC Public HealthJournal of Epidemiology & Community Health
- Partner nations
- TaiwanUnited StatesCzechia
In The Last Decade
Li‐Jen Weng
34 papers receiving 1.8k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 149
- Sociology and Political Science 603
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 386
- Clinical Psychology 368
- Education 334
- Health 300
Countries citing papers authored by Li‐Jen Weng
This map shows the geographic impact of Li‐Jen Weng's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Li‐Jen Weng with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Li‐Jen Weng more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Li‐Jen Weng
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Li‐Jen Weng. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Li‐Jen Weng. The network helps show where Li‐Jen Weng may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Li‐Jen Weng
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Li‐Jen Weng. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Li‐Jen Weng based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Li‐Jen Weng. Li‐Jen Weng is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | Improvement in the Physical and Psychological Well-Being of Persons with Spinal Cord Injuries by Means of Powered Wheelchairs Driven by Dual Power Wheels and Mobile Technologies | 1 |
| 3 | 85 | |
| 4 | 90 | |
| 5 | 16 | |
| 6 | 45 | |
| 7 | 8 | |
| 8 | 20 | |
| 9 | 252 | |
| 10 | 17 | |
| 11 | 13 | |
| 12 | 17 | |
| 13 | 27 | |
| 14 | 31 | |
| 15 | 14 | |
| 16 | 7 | |
| 17 | 62 | |
| 18 | 17 | |
| 19 | 70 | |
| 20 | Factors Influencing Noncompletion of High School: A Comparison of Methodologies. | 25 |
About Li‐Jen Weng
Li‐Jen Weng is a scholar working on Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Health and Statistics and Probability, having authored 36 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychometric Methodologies and Testing (8 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (6 papers) and Advanced Statistical Modeling Techniques (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (64 citations), Health (300 citations) and Applied Psychology (167 citations). Li‐Jen Weng has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, United States and Czechia. Frequent co-authors include Arthur R. Jensen, Chi Chiao, Amanda Botticello, Chung‐Ping Cheng, Po‐Hsien Huang, Pei–Ming Yang, Hui‐Ching Wu, WL Chen, Wu Hm and Yuhao Su. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, BMC Public Health and Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.