Chi‐hong B. Chen

521 total citations
9 papers, 424 citations indexed

About

Chi‐hong B. Chen is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Physiology and Organic Chemistry. According to data from OpenAlex, Chi‐hong B. Chen has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 424 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Molecular Biology, 2 papers in Physiology and 1 paper in Organic Chemistry. Recurrent topics in Chi‐hong B. Chen's work include DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry (6 papers), Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques (5 papers) and RNA Interference and Gene Delivery (4 papers). Chi‐hong B. Chen is often cited by papers focused on DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry (6 papers), Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques (5 papers) and RNA Interference and Gene Delivery (4 papers). Chi‐hong B. Chen collaborates with scholars based in United States. Chi‐hong B. Chen's co-authors include David S. Sigman, Yi-Zhong An, Jamey L. Anderson, Christopher S. Foote, Yves Rubin, Rachel Myerowitz, Elizabeth F. Neufeld, Christopher P. Ouellette, Gal Bitan and Kazuma Murakami and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Nucleic Acids Research and PLoS ONE.

In The Last Decade

Chi‐hong B. Chen

9 papers receiving 411 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Chi‐hong B. Chen United States 7 281 117 110 34 32 9 424
Ronald M. Kim United States 8 253 0.9× 133 1.1× 93 0.8× 26 0.8× 23 0.7× 11 409
Ulrike Reinhardt Germany 9 289 1.0× 173 1.5× 90 0.8× 25 0.7× 18 0.6× 14 458
Martin R. Krause United States 8 271 1.0× 137 1.2× 72 0.7× 9 0.3× 16 0.5× 10 422
Ronald M. Cook United States 12 470 1.7× 167 1.4× 115 1.0× 37 1.1× 7 0.2× 20 623
Mary Katherine Johansson United States 6 321 1.1× 70 0.6× 118 1.1× 22 0.6× 7 0.2× 7 462
Małgorzata Sierant Poland 11 371 1.3× 57 0.5× 46 0.4× 33 1.0× 11 0.3× 30 460
Yannick Tauran France 12 230 0.8× 137 1.2× 120 1.1× 15 0.4× 61 1.9× 37 509
Silvia Sonzini United Kingdom 11 220 0.8× 189 1.6× 70 0.6× 22 0.6× 16 0.5× 22 466
Roger G. Hanshaw United States 7 247 0.9× 54 0.5× 83 0.8× 38 1.1× 6 0.2× 8 435

Countries citing papers authored by Chi‐hong B. Chen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chi‐hong B. Chen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chi‐hong B. Chen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chi‐hong B. Chen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chi‐hong B. Chen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chi‐hong B. Chen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chi‐hong B. Chen. The network helps show where Chi‐hong B. Chen may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Chi‐hong B. Chen

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Chi‐hong B. Chen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Chi‐hong B. Chen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Chi‐hong B. Chen. Chi‐hong B. Chen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
1.
Rahimi, Farid, et al.. (2009). RNA Aptamers Generated against Oligomeric Aβ40 Recognize Common Amyloid Aptatopes with Low Specificity but High Sensitivity. PLoS ONE. 4(11). e7694–e7694. 56 indexed citations
2.
Chen, Chi‐hong B., et al.. (2008). Aptamer-based endocytosis of a lysosomal enzyme. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 105(41). 15908–15913. 131 indexed citations
3.
Hwang, Jae-Taeg, et al.. (2003). Transcription inhibition using modified pentanucleotides. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry. 11(10). 2321–2328. 5 indexed citations
4.
Xiao, Gaoping, et al.. (2002). Site‐specific DNA cleavage of synthetic NarL sites by an engineered Escherichia coli NarL protein–1,10‐phenanthroline cleaving agent. Protein Science. 11(10). 2427–2436. 10 indexed citations
5.
Chen, Chi‐hong B., Ralf Landgraf, Avram Walts, et al.. (1998). Scission of DNA at a preselected sequence using a single-strand-specific chemical nuclease. Chemistry & Biology. 5(5). 283–292. 16 indexed citations
6.
Gallagher, James J., et al.. (1996). Optimizing the Targeted Chemical Nuclease Activity of 1,10-Phenanthroline−Copper by Ligand Modification. Bioconjugate Chemistry. 7(4). 413–420. 28 indexed citations
7.
An, Yi-Zhong, Chi‐hong B. Chen, Jamey L. Anderson, et al.. (1996). Sequence-specific modification of guanosine in DNA by a C60-linked deoxyoligonucleotide: Evidence for a non-singlet oxygen mechanism. Tetrahedron. 52(14). 5179–5189. 119 indexed citations
8.
Landgraf, Ralf, Chi‐hong B. Chen, & David S. Sigman. (1995). Double stranded scission of DNA directed through sequence-specific R-loop formation. Nucleic Acids Research. 23(17). 3524–3530. 5 indexed citations
9.
Murakawa, George J., Chi‐hong B. Chen, Michio D. Kuwabara, Donald P. Nierlich, & David S. Sigman. (1989). Scission of RNA by the chemical nuclease of 1,10-phenanthroline-eopper ion: preference for single-stranded loops. Nucleic Acids Research. 17(13). 5361–5376. 54 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026