Chetan S. Sankar

1.5k total citations
124 papers, 1.0k citations indexed

About

Chetan S. Sankar is a scholar working on Media Technology, Education and Information Systems. According to data from OpenAlex, Chetan S. Sankar has authored 124 papers receiving a total of 1.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 31 papers in Media Technology, 29 papers in Education and 26 papers in Information Systems. Recurrent topics in Chetan S. Sankar's work include Engineering Education and Curriculum Development (22 papers), Experimental Learning in Engineering (17 papers) and Engineering Education and Pedagogy (15 papers). Chetan S. Sankar is often cited by papers focused on Engineering Education and Curriculum Development (22 papers), Experimental Learning in Engineering (17 papers) and Engineering Education and Pedagogy (15 papers). Chetan S. Sankar collaborates with scholars based in United States, India and Singapore. Chetan S. Sankar's co-authors include P. K. Raju, Victor Mbarika, Uday Apte, Yichuan Wang, F. Nelson Ford, Yajiong Xue, L. Allison Jones‐Farmer, Benjamin T. Hazen, Howard R. Clayton and Yun Wu and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Management Science and Cancer Research.

In The Last Decade

Chetan S. Sankar

103 papers receiving 852 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Chetan S. Sankar United States 17 320 230 211 150 148 124 1.0k
Moti Frank Israel 17 424 1.3× 266 1.2× 78 0.4× 94 0.6× 41 0.3× 42 1.0k
Edmundo Tovar Spain 16 247 0.8× 156 0.7× 394 1.9× 144 1.0× 140 0.9× 160 1.2k
William Swart United States 16 260 0.8× 152 0.7× 52 0.2× 56 0.4× 79 0.5× 58 1.0k
Norman R. Augustine United States 11 828 2.6× 379 1.6× 64 0.3× 207 1.4× 21 0.1× 24 1.7k
Fadi P. Deek United States 15 124 0.4× 69 0.3× 299 1.4× 127 0.8× 65 0.4× 108 757
Keith Willey Australia 14 414 1.3× 211 0.9× 64 0.3× 90 0.6× 57 0.4× 91 830
Douglas L. Dean United States 16 689 2.2× 237 1.0× 359 1.7× 136 0.9× 184 1.2× 49 1.8k
David Birchall United Kingdom 17 171 0.5× 112 0.5× 147 0.7× 23 0.2× 144 1.0× 66 972
Tony Clear New Zealand 23 404 1.3× 249 1.1× 766 3.6× 489 3.3× 57 0.4× 161 1.8k
Shi‐Jer Lou Taiwan 20 621 1.9× 79 0.3× 228 1.1× 239 1.6× 30 0.2× 87 1.3k

Countries citing papers authored by Chetan S. Sankar

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chetan S. Sankar's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chetan S. Sankar with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chetan S. Sankar more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chetan S. Sankar

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chetan S. Sankar. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chetan S. Sankar. The network helps show where Chetan S. Sankar may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Chetan S. Sankar

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Chetan S. Sankar. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Chetan S. Sankar based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Chetan S. Sankar. Chetan S. Sankar is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Jones‐Farmer, L. Allison, et al.. (2016). Learning technologies: bridging the gap between intention, adoption and routine use. International journal of engineering education. 32(5). 2107–2120. 2 indexed citations
2.
Sankar, Chetan S. & Yun-Ta Wu. (2015). Design Experiential Learning Activities for MIS Introductory Courses. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 1 indexed citations
3.
Sankar, Chetan S., et al.. (2015). Conceptualizing interactions between innovation characteristics and organizational members’readiness to adopt educational innovations. International journal of engineering education. 31(4). 967–985. 3 indexed citations
4.
Raju, P. K., et al.. (2015). Influence of Team Skills in Engineering Technology.. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 1 indexed citations
5.
Sankar, Chetan S., et al.. (2015). Enhancing Minority Student Leadership Skills Using Case Studies. Journal of Computer Information Systems. 51. 82–90. 3 indexed citations
6.
Wang, Yichuan, et al.. (2014). Relationships between Goal Clarity, Concentration and Learning Effectiveness when Playing Serious Games. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 6 indexed citations
7.
Wang, Yichuan, et al.. (2014). Female and Minority Students Benefit from Use of Multimedia Case Studies. International journal of engineering education. 30(2). 343–359. 8 indexed citations
8.
Sankar, Chetan S., et al.. (2011). Student Satisfaction with Information Provided by Academic Advisors. Journal of STEM education. 12(7). 71–85. 27 indexed citations
9.
Mbarika, Victor, et al.. (2010). A Multi-Experimental Study on the Use of Multimedia Instructional Materials to Teach Technical Subjects. Journal of STEM education. 2010(1). 16 indexed citations
10.
Cegielski, Casey G., et al.. (2009). An Exploratory Delphi Study among Small Business Executives on Adoption of Disaster Recovery Practices. 5(1). 61–87. 1 indexed citations
11.
Sankar, Chetan S., et al.. (2009). Preparing students for global research experiences: US-India summer projects. International journal of engineering education. 25(5). 1046–1058. 1 indexed citations
12.
Sankar, Chetan S., et al.. (2006). Implementation Strategies for SAP R/3 in a Multinational Organization: Lessons from a Real-World Case Study. Cancer Research. 44(3). 1122–7. 6 indexed citations
13.
Sankar, Chetan S., et al.. (2005). Results of an experiment comparing the Analysis of Chick-fil-A Case Study by virtual teams versus face-to-face teams. Journal of STEM education. 4(1). 3 indexed citations
14.
Sankar, Chetan S., et al.. (2005). Integrating a Real Life Engineering Case Study into the Syllabus of an Undergraduate Network Programming using HTML and Java course. Journal of STEM education. 4(1). 5 indexed citations
15.
Raju, P. K., et al.. (2005). In Hot Water: A Cooling Tower Case Study. Journal of STEM education. 6(3). 41–62. 1 indexed citations
16.
Bradley, R., et al.. (2005). An Empirical Investigation of the Impact of GPA on Perceived Improvement of Higher Order Cognitive Skills.. Americas Conference on Information Systems. 496.
17.
Sankar, Chetan S., et al.. (2005). Implications and Ramifications of Engineering Design of Field Joint for Space Shuttle: STS 51-L - A Case Study - Instructor's Guide. Journal of STEM education. 1(1). 2 indexed citations
18.
Sankar, Chetan S., et al.. (2002). Dissemination of Innovations from an Educational Research Project through Focused Workshops. Journal of STEM education. 3(3). 2 indexed citations
19.
Sankar, Chetan S., et al.. (2002). Special Issue on the AMCIS 2001 Workshops: Bringing Real-World Issues into Classrooms: A Multi-Media Case Study Approach. Communications of the Association for Information Systems. 8. 5 indexed citations
20.
Byrd, Terry Anthony, et al.. (1994). The risks associated with planning and implementing global information technology systems. IGI Global eBooks. 514–539. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026