Moti Frank

1.5k citations
42 papers · 1.0k · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Moti Frank

41 papers receiving 900 citations

Peers

Moti Frank
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
  • Media Technology 266
  • Management Science and Operations Research 289
  • Architecture 35
  • Education 424
  • Computer Science Applications 69
Replace William Swart with:
William Swart United States
Jack R. Lohmann United States
Keith Willey Australia
Doris R. Brodeur United States
Peter Charles Woods Malaysia
Joseph R. Herkert United States
Marcela Hernández-de-Menéndez Mexico
Edmundo Tovar Spain
Jack McGourty United States
Karen M. Bursic United States
Moti Frank relative to William Swart United States William Swart's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
William Swart · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Moti Frank

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Moti Frank's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Moti Frank with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Moti Frank more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Moti Frank

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Moti Frank. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Moti Frank. The network helps show where Moti Frank may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside Moti Frank, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Moti Frank Line = papers co-authored together Moti Frank links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003280
2 2004132
3 200080
4 200659
5 200247
6 200944
7 201838
8 201235
9 200529
10 200122
11 201121
12 199920
13 200620
14 200020
15 200218
16 201218
17 200516
18 200715
19
Implications of Presenting Pre-University Courses Using the Blended e-Learning Approach
200213
20 200013

About Moti Frank

Moti Frank is a scholar working on Control and Systems Engineering, Management Science and Operations Research, Media Technology, Mechanical Engineering and Education, having authored 42 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Systems Engineering Methodologies and Applications (27 papers), Complex Systems and Decision Making (19 papers), Design Education and Practice (8 papers), Engineering Education and Curriculum Development (8 papers), Technology Assessment and Management (8 papers), Organizational Learning and Leadership (7 papers), Software Engineering Techniques and Practices (5 papers) and Problem and Project Based Learning (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Media Technology (266 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (289 citations), Architecture (35 citations), Education (424 citations) and Computer Science Applications (69 citations). Moti Frank has collaborated with scholars based in Israel, Singapore and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include David Elata, Ilana Lavy, Shlomo Waks, Keith Humphreys, Arik Sadeh, Joseph Eli Kasser, Yang Zhao, Ofer Zwikael, Derek K. Hitchins and Gila Kurtz. Their work appears in journals such as Systems Engineering, Journal of Technology Education, Project Management Journal, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education and European Journal of Engineering Education.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact