Cheryl-Anne Cait

420 total citations
21 papers, 242 citations indexed

About

Cheryl-Anne Cait is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Cheryl-Anne Cait has authored 21 papers receiving a total of 242 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in Clinical Psychology, 6 papers in General Health Professions and 6 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Cheryl-Anne Cait's work include Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (8 papers), Family Support in Illness (5 papers) and Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics (4 papers). Cheryl-Anne Cait is often cited by papers focused on Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (8 papers), Family Support in Illness (5 papers) and Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics (4 papers). Cheryl-Anne Cait collaborates with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Cheryl-Anne Cait's co-authors include Carol Stalker, Susan Horton, John E. Baker, Phyllis R. Silverman, Kathrin Boerner, Manuel Riemer, Joan Berzoff, Barbara Dane, Franco A. Carnevale and Georg Bollig and has published in prestigious journals such as The British Journal of Social Work, Journal of Mental Health and OMEGA - Journal of Death and Dying.

In The Last Decade

Cheryl-Anne Cait

19 papers receiving 221 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Cheryl-Anne Cait Canada 9 183 65 53 47 32 21 242
Anushka Patel United States 11 184 1.0× 80 1.2× 50 0.9× 42 0.9× 35 1.1× 22 269
Melissa W. George United States 12 209 1.1× 108 1.7× 56 1.1× 44 0.9× 30 0.9× 20 322
Louise Lynch United Kingdom 4 138 0.8× 106 1.6× 74 1.4× 43 0.9× 27 0.8× 7 241
Simona Skripkauskaitė United Kingdom 7 197 1.1× 60 0.9× 34 0.6× 56 1.2× 22 0.7× 20 292
Michelle Kearns Ireland 9 177 1.0× 76 1.2× 57 1.1× 72 1.5× 15 0.5× 19 308
Enya Redican United Kingdom 10 303 1.7× 59 0.9× 66 1.2× 30 0.6× 13 0.4× 36 374
Inês Jongenelen Portugal 10 199 1.1× 67 1.0× 42 0.8× 45 1.0× 21 0.7× 38 293
Katherine Ottman United States 8 119 0.7× 67 1.0× 58 1.1× 27 0.6× 16 0.5× 12 201
Lance T. Peterson United States 4 159 0.9× 51 0.8× 61 1.2× 33 0.7× 23 0.7× 12 259
Jessica Coifman United States 7 213 1.2× 60 0.9× 161 3.0× 39 0.8× 31 1.0× 7 338

Countries citing papers authored by Cheryl-Anne Cait

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cheryl-Anne Cait's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cheryl-Anne Cait with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cheryl-Anne Cait more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Cheryl-Anne Cait

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cheryl-Anne Cait. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cheryl-Anne Cait. The network helps show where Cheryl-Anne Cait may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Cheryl-Anne Cait

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Cheryl-Anne Cait. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Cheryl-Anne Cait based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Cheryl-Anne Cait. Cheryl-Anne Cait is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Bollig, Georg, et al.. (2024). Re-Imagining Childhood Grief: Children as Active Agents in a Transactional Process. OMEGA - Journal of Death and Dying. 4277592632–4277592632.
2.
Cait, Cheryl-Anne, et al.. (2024). “Stop Imposing on Us”: A Critical Examination of Ethnocultural Considerations in the Canadian Volunteer Hospice Palliative Care Landscape. Journal of Social Work in End-of-Life & Palliative Care. 20(2). 185–200. 1 indexed citations
3.
Cait, Cheryl-Anne, et al.. (2023). Nonphysical Suffering: An Under-Resourced and Key Role for Hospice and Palliative Care Social Workers. Journal of Social Work in End-of-Life & Palliative Care. 20(1). 8–25. 2 indexed citations
4.
Cait, Cheryl-Anne, et al.. (2021). Epistemology and Arts-Based Pedagogy: Pictures from a Doctoral Classroom. Journal of Teaching in Social Work. 41(2). 103–116.
5.
Riemer, Manuel, et al.. (2018). The Walk-in Counselling Model of Service Delivery: Who Benefits Most?. Canadian Journal of Community Mental Health. 37(2). 29–47. 4 indexed citations
6.
Stalker, Carol, et al.. (2017). Cost-effectiveness analysis of single-session walk-in counselling. Journal of Mental Health. 27(6). 560–566. 8 indexed citations
7.
Cait, Cheryl-Anne, et al.. (2016). Social Work Curriculum Review Case Study. Érudit (Université de Montréal). 33(1). 27–44. 2 indexed citations
8.
Cait, Cheryl-Anne, et al.. (2016). Practice-based qualitative research: Participant experiences of walk-in counselling and traditional counselling. Qualitative Social Work. 16(5). 612–630. 7 indexed citations
9.
Stalker, Carol, et al.. (2015). A comparison of walk-in counselling and the wait list model for delivering counselling services. Journal of Mental Health. 25(5). 403–409. 19 indexed citations
10.
Stalker, Carol, et al.. (2013). The case for single-session therapy: Does the empirical evidence support the increased prevalence of this service delivery model?. Journal of Mental Health. 22(1). 60–71. 79 indexed citations
11.
Stalker, Carol, Susan Horton, & Cheryl-Anne Cait. (2012). Single-Session Therapy in a Walk-in Counseling Clinic: A Pilot Study. Journal of Systemic Therapies. 31(1). 38–52. 22 indexed citations
12.
Horton, Susan, et al.. (2012). Sustaining walk-in counselling services: an economic assessment from a pilot study.. PubMed. 15(3). 44–9. 5 indexed citations
13.
Horton, Susan, et al.. (2012). Sustaining Walk-In Counselling Services. Healthcare Quarterly. 15(3). 44–49. 11 indexed citations
14.
Cait, Cheryl-Anne. (2011). Adolescent bereavement and systemic denial of death: political implications of psychotherapy. Journal of Social Work Practice. 26(1). 75–91. 2 indexed citations
15.
Cait, Cheryl-Anne, et al.. (2006). A Relational Psychoanalytic Model for Case Management: A Literature Review. Psychoanalytic Social Work. 13(1). 67–83. 3 indexed citations
16.
Cait, Cheryl-Anne. (2006). Identity Development and Grieving: The Evolving Processes for Parentally Bereaved Women. The British Journal of Social Work. 38(2). 322–339. 4 indexed citations
17.
Cait, Cheryl-Anne. (2005). Parental Death, Shifting Family Dynamics, and Female Identity Development. OMEGA - Journal of Death and Dying. 51(2). 87–105. 12 indexed citations
18.
Berzoff, Joan, Barbara Dane, & Cheryl-Anne Cait. (2005). Innovative Models for Developing Post-Masters Curriculum in End-of-Life Care. Journal of Teaching in Social Work. 25(3-4). 63–88. 10 indexed citations
19.
Cait, Cheryl-Anne. (2004). Spiritual and Religious Transformation in Women Who Were Parentally Bereaved as Adolescents. OMEGA - Journal of Death and Dying. 49(2). 163–181. 15 indexed citations
20.
Silverman, Phyllis R., John E. Baker, Cheryl-Anne Cait, & Kathrin Boerner. (2003). The Effects of Negative Legacies on the Adjustment of Parentally Bereaved Children and Adolescents. OMEGA - Journal of Death and Dying. 46(4). 335–352. 32 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Anushka Patel Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Melissa W. George Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Louise Lynch Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Simona Skripkauskaitė Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Michelle Kearns Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Enya Redican Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Inês Jongenelen Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Katherine Ottman Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Lance T. Peterson Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jessica Coifman
Rankless by CCL
2026