Clinical Social Work Journal

1.6k papers and 15.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.6k papers published in Clinical Social Work Journal in the last decades have received a total of 15.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Clinical Social Work Journal usually cover Clinical Psychology (1.0k papers), Social Psychology (380 papers) and General Health Professions (257 papers) specifically the topics of Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (493 papers), Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics (313 papers) and Social Work Education and Practice (224 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Clinical Social Work Journal are Marion Bogo, Charles R. Figley, Eda G. Goldstein, Carolyn Knight, Pat Sable, Melissa Radey, Allan N. Schore, Cheryl Springer, Joseph Palombo and Brian E. Bride.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Clinical Social Work Journal

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Clinical Social Work Journal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Clinical Social Work Journal.

Countries where authors publish in Clinical Social Work Journal

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Clinical Social Work Journal. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Clinical Social Work Journal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clinical Social Work Journal more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025