Psychoanalytic Social Work

226 papers and 978 indexed citations i.

About

The 226 papers published in Psychoanalytic Social Work in the last decades have received a total of 978 indexed citations. Papers published in Psychoanalytic Social Work usually cover Clinical Psychology (185 papers), Social Psychology (67 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (21 papers) specifically the topics of Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (142 papers), Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics (57 papers) and Transactional Analysis in Psychotherapy (30 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Psychoanalytic Social Work are Shoshana Ringel, Deborah J. Weatherston, Jerrold R. Brandell, Joseph Palombo, Susan Lord, Maria Napoli, Jeffrey S. Applegate, Kim Jones, Ofir Levi and Robert Waska.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Psychoanalytic Social Work

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Psychoanalytic Social Work. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Psychoanalytic Social Work.

Countries where authors publish in Psychoanalytic Social Work

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Psychoanalytic Social Work. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Psychoanalytic Social Work with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Psychoanalytic Social Work more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025