Charles Lamb
- Literature and Literary Theory top 10%
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- History top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Marketing
- Topics
- Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (2 papers)Biblical Studies and Interpretation (2 papers)Theatre and Performance Studies (1 paper)
- Journals
- Services Marketing QuarterlyHuntington Library QuarterlyCentAUR (University of Reading)
In The Last Decade
Charles Lamb
16 papers receiving 56 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 30
- Literature and Literary Theory 27
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 20
- History 17
- Sociology and Political Science 14
- Marketing 13
Countries citing papers authored by Charles Lamb
This map shows the geographic impact of Charles Lamb's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Charles Lamb with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Charles Lamb more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Charles Lamb
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Charles Lamb. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Charles Lamb. The network helps show where Charles Lamb may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Charles Lamb
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Charles Lamb. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Charles Lamb based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Charles Lamb. Charles Lamb is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tales from Shakespear : designed for the use of young persons | 0 |
| 2 | The Works of Charles Lamb: To Which Are Prefixed, His Letters, and a Sketch of His Life | 3 |
| 3 | The essays of Elia : First series. | 0 |
| 4 | Essays of Charles Lamb | 1 |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | Lamb and Hazlitt: Further Letters and Records Hitherto Unpublished | 0 |
| 7 | The best letters of Charles Lamb | 0 |
| 8 | Letters of Charles Lamb | 4 |
| 9 | The letters of Charles Lamb : with a sketch of his life | 1 |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | Henry Holmes Smith Papers | 0 |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | Essays and Sketches | 4 |
| 14 | Charles Lamb on Shakespeare | 8 |
| 15 | Visits to the Juvenile Library | 1 |
| 16 | 3 | |
| 17 | Charles Lamb, his life recorded by his contemporaries | 2 |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | Essays, Letters and Poems | 0 |
| 20 | Essays of Elia and Last essays of Elia | 0 |
About Charles Lamb
Charles Lamb is a scholar working on Religious studies, Conservation and Visual Arts and Performing Arts, having authored 35 papers that have together received 77 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (2 papers), Biblical Studies and Interpretation (2 papers) and Theatre and Performance Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (27 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (20 citations) and History (17 citations). Frequent co-authors include Julie Baker, John L. Crompton, John L. Crompton, Jonathan Bate and William Hazlitt. Their work appears in journals such as Services Marketing Quarterly, Huntington Library Quarterly and CentAUR (University of Reading).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.