Countries citing papers authored by William Hazlitt
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of William Hazlitt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Hazlitt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Hazlitt more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Hazlitt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Hazlitt. The network helps show where William Hazlitt may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of William Hazlitt
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William Hazlitt.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William Hazlitt based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with William Hazlitt. William Hazlitt is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Luther, Martin & William Hazlitt. (2010). The Table Talk Or Familiar Discourse of Martin Luther. Medical Entomology and Zoology.2 indexed citations
3.
Hazlitt, William. (2010). Conversations of James Northcote, R. A.. Medical Entomology and Zoology.3 indexed citations
4.
Hazlitt, William, et al.. (2008). Liber amoris and related writings.
5.
Lamb, Charles & William Hazlitt. (2007). Lamb and Hazlitt: Further Letters and Records Hitherto Unpublished. The Journal of the Abraham Lincoln Association.
Hazlitt, William. (2002). Sobre el ingenio y el humor (Conferencias sobrelos escritores cómicos ingleses, 1818). CIC Cuadernos de Información y Comunicación. 69–94.
8.
Hazlitt, William. (2002). Sobre el ingenio y el humor. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.1 indexed citations
9.
Hazlitt, William, et al.. (1977). Fairy tales, legends and romances, illustrating Shakespeare and other early English writers : (1875). Olms eBooks.1 indexed citations
Hazlitt, William, et al.. (1970). A new and improved grammar of the English tongue : for the use of schools . A grammar of the English language, in a series of letters.1 indexed citations
12.
Hazlitt, William, et al.. (1969). An essay on the principles of human action : and some remarks on the systems of Hartley and Helvetius (1805).41 indexed citations
13.
Hazlitt, William & Thomas Robert Malthus. (1967). A reply to the essay on population.1 indexed citations
14.
Hazlitt, William. (1967). Literary and Political criticism. AMS Press eBooks.1 indexed citations
15.
Hazlitt, William. (1967). The spirit of the age and Conversations of James Northcote, Esq., R.A..1 indexed citations
16.
Hazlitt, William & William Shakespeare. (1967). The round table and Characters of Shakespear's plays. AMS Press eBooks.
17.
Hazlitt, William, et al.. (1967). The complete works of William Hazlitt : centenary edition. AMS Press eBooks.
18.
Hazlitt, William. (1965). Faiths and folklore of the British Isles : a descriptive and historical dictionary of the superstitions, beliefs, and popular customs of England, Scotland, Wales, and Ireland, from Norman times to the end of the nineteenth century, with classical and foreign analogues.
19.
Hazlitt, William, et al.. (1957). Hazlitt on theatre. Medical Entomology and Zoology.4 indexed citations
20.
Montaigne, Michel de, Robert Maynard Hutchins, Charles Cotton, & William Hazlitt. (1952). The essays of Michel Eyquem de Montaigne.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.