William Hazlitt

649 total papers · 2.7k total citations
77 papers, 215 citations indexed

About

William Hazlitt is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, History and Visual Arts and Performing Arts. According to data from OpenAlex, William Hazlitt has authored 77 papers receiving a total of 215 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Literature and Literary Theory, 7 papers in History and 4 papers in Visual Arts and Performing Arts. Recurrent topics in William Hazlitt's work include Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (4 papers), French Literature and Criticism (3 papers) and Historical Studies of British Isles (3 papers). William Hazlitt is often cited by papers focused on Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (4 papers), French Literature and Criticism (3 papers) and Historical Studies of British Isles (3 papers). William Hazlitt collaborates with scholars based in . William Hazlitt's co-authors include David Chandler, Tom Paulin, François Pierre Guillaume Guizot, Thomas Warton, Martin Luther, Arthur Johnston, John Valdimir Price, Charles Cotton, William Archer and Robert Maynard Hutchins and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, The Modern Language Review and Interchange.

In The Last Decade

William Hazlitt

42 papers receiving 141 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
William Hazlitt 60 52 42 26 25 77 215
Meyer Schapiro 35 0.6× 47 0.9× 25 0.6× 41 1.6× 30 1.2× 48 294
Yve-Alain Bois 35 0.6× 43 0.8× 16 0.4× 25 1.0× 15 0.6× 43 266
Richard Kostelanetz 45 0.8× 42 0.8× 30 0.7× 12 0.5× 28 1.1× 66 311
Karsten Harries 37 0.6× 63 1.2× 48 1.1× 27 1.0× 17 0.7× 65 319
Gerald Gillespie 87 1.4× 68 1.3× 37 0.9× 27 1.0× 5 0.2× 66 318
John Keats 111 1.9× 46 0.9× 23 0.5× 28 1.1× 11 0.4× 67 302
Herman Roodenburg 35 0.6× 71 1.4× 32 0.8× 69 2.7× 11 0.4× 42 289
Moshe Barasch 26 0.4× 39 0.8× 24 0.6× 61 2.3× 27 1.1× 36 243
Julián Marías 44 0.7× 78 1.5× 20 0.5× 25 1.0× 14 0.6× 99 320
Frederick Burwick 80 1.3× 40 0.8× 12 0.3× 27 1.0× 8 0.3× 67 229

Countries citing papers authored by William Hazlitt

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Hazlitt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Hazlitt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Hazlitt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Hazlitt

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Hazlitt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Hazlitt. The network helps show where William Hazlitt may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of William Hazlitt

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William Hazlitt. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William Hazlitt based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William Hazlitt. William Hazlitt is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026