Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Selling Science: How the Press Covers Science and Technology
Countries citing papers authored by Dorothy Nelkin
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Dorothy Nelkin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dorothy Nelkin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dorothy Nelkin more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dorothy Nelkin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dorothy Nelkin. The network helps show where Dorothy Nelkin may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dorothy Nelkin
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dorothy Nelkin.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dorothy Nelkin based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Dorothy Nelkin. Dorothy Nelkin is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Nelkin, Dorothy, et al.. (2004). The molecular gaze : art in the genetic age.44 indexed citations
Nelkin, Dorothy & Lori B. Andrews. (1999). Introduction: The Body, Economic Power and Social Control: Introduction. Chicago-Kent law review. 75(1). 3.
4.
Testart, J, et al.. (1998). La mystique de l'ADN : pourquoi sommes-nous fascinés par le gène ?.2 indexed citations
5.
Nelkin, Dorothy & Laurence R. Tancredi. (1994). Dangerous diagnostics : the social power of biological information : with a new preface. University of Chicago Press eBooks.6 indexed citations
6.
Nelkin, Dorothy. (1994). Reporting Risk: The Case of Silicone Breast Implants. University of New Hampshire Scholars Repository (University of New Hampshire at Manchester). 5(3). 8.3 indexed citations
7.
Dreyfuss, Rochelle Cooper & Dorothy Nelkin. (1992). The jurisprudence of genetics.. PubMed. 45(2). 313–48.23 indexed citations
8.
Nelkin, Dorothy. (1991). Las imágenes de la ciencia en la prensa americana. Arbor. 129–142.2 indexed citations
9.
Nelkin, Dorothy & Melisa F. Pollak. (1988). Public Participation in Technological Decisions : Reality or Grand Illusion : Technology Review. 3(4). 556.17 indexed citations
10.
Nelkin, Dorothy. (1986). How to doctor the media.. DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library). 112(1535). 51–6.5 indexed citations
Nelkin, Dorothy. (1982). Science, Rationality, and the Creation/Evolution Dispute.. Social Education. 46(4).2 indexed citations
16.
Nelkin, Dorothy, et al.. (1980). Labor and Nuclear Power. Environment Science and Policy for Sustainable Development. 22(2). 6–34.10 indexed citations
17.
Nelkin, Dorothy. (1977). Technological decisions and democracy : European experiments in public participation. DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library).33 indexed citations
18.
Hohenberg, Paul M., et al.. (1971). A Program to Coordinate Environmental Research. 59(2). 183–187.2 indexed citations
19.
Nelkin, Dorothy. (1970). On the season : aspects of the migrant labor system.8 indexed citations
20.
Nelkin, Dorothy. (1965). Search For Continental Unity. Africa report. 10. 14–15.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.