Cathryn Booth‐LaForce
- Clinical Psychology top 0.5%
- Social Psychology top 0.5%
- Education top 1%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 2%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 2%
- Co-authors
- Kenneth H. RubinLinda Rose‐KrasnorKim B. BurgessGlenn I. RoismanNancy L. McElwainJulie C. WojslawowiczMonica L. OxfordBrett Laursen
- Topics
- Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (53 papers)Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (30 papers)Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum (19 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Cathryn Booth‐LaForce
99 papers receiving 3.8k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 128
- Clinical Psychology 2.6k
- Social Psychology 1.9k
- Education 866
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 617
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 521
Countries citing papers authored by Cathryn Booth‐LaForce
This map shows the geographic impact of Cathryn Booth‐LaForce's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cathryn Booth‐LaForce with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cathryn Booth‐LaForce more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Cathryn Booth‐LaForce
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cathryn Booth‐LaForce. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cathryn Booth‐LaForce. The network helps show where Cathryn Booth‐LaForce may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Cathryn Booth‐LaForce
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Cathryn Booth‐LaForce. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Cathryn Booth‐LaForce based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Cathryn Booth‐LaForce. Cathryn Booth‐LaForce is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 6 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 6 | |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | 3 | |
| 11 | 8 | |
| 12 | 34 | |
| 13 | 7 | |
| 14 | 3 | |
| 15 | 37 | |
| 16 | 67 | |
| 17 | 84 | |
| 18 | 53 | |
| 19 | 15 | |
| 20 | Behavioral Characteristics Associated withStable and Fluid Best Friendship Patternsin Middle Childhood | 1 |
About Cathryn Booth‐LaForce
Cathryn Booth‐LaForce is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology and Safety Research, having authored 102 papers that have together received 4.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (53 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (30 papers) and Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum (19 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (2.6k citations), Social Psychology (1.9k citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (521 citations). Cathryn Booth‐LaForce has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Kenneth H. Rubin, Linda Rose‐Krasnor, Kim B. Burgess, Glenn I. Roisman, Nancy L. McElwain, Julie C. Wojslawowicz, Monica L. Oxford, Brett Laursen, Julie C. Bowker and Kathleen M. Dwyer. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, PLoS ONE and Child Development.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.