Catherine Warren
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Public Administration top 5%
- Education top 10%
- Co-authors
- Pippa BeldersonJane DodsworthMarian BrandonDavid HoweJessica L. WildmanDaniel NguyenSue BaileyPeter Sidebotham
- Topics
- Gender Diversity and Inequality (4 papers)Social and Intergroup Psychology (3 papers)Child Abuse and Trauma (3 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Occupational and Organizational PsychologyApplied PsychologySmall Group Research
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomAustralia
In The Last Decade
Catherine Warren
13 papers receiving 288 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
- Clinical Psychology 197
- General Health Professions 101
- Sociology and Political Science 91
- Public Administration 75
- Education 65
Countries citing papers authored by Catherine Warren
This map shows the geographic impact of Catherine Warren's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Catherine Warren with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Catherine Warren more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Catherine Warren
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Catherine Warren. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Catherine Warren. The network helps show where Catherine Warren may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Catherine Warren
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Catherine Warren. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Catherine Warren based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Catherine Warren. Catherine Warren is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 54 | |
| 9 | 23 | |
| 10 | Understanding serious case reviews and their impact - a biennial analysis of serious case reviews 2005-07 | 88 |
| 11 | 25 | |
| 12 | Analysing Child Deaths and Serious Injury through Abuse and Neglect: What can we learn? Biennial Analysis of Serious Case Reviews 2003-2005 | 97 |
| 13 | Improving safeguarding practice | 8 |
| 14 | 4 | |
| 15 | Evaluating the Common Assessment Framework and Lead professional Guidance and Implementation in 2005-6. DfES:UEA 2006. Research report 740. | 10 |
| 16 | 27 |
About Catherine Warren
Catherine Warren is a scholar working on Communication, Gender Studies and Social Psychology, having authored 16 papers that have together received 344 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gender Diversity and Inequality (4 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (3 papers) and Child Abuse and Trauma (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (75 citations), Clinical Psychology (197 citations) and Safety Research (63 citations). Catherine Warren has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Pippa Belderson, Jane Dodsworth, Marian Brandon, David Howe, Jessica L. Wildman, Daniel Nguyen, Sue Bailey, Peter Sidebotham, Charlotte Salter and Amanda Howe. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, Applied Psychology and Small Group Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.