Catherine Suttle
- Ophthalmology top 1%
- Glaucoma and retinal disorders 6
- Ophthalmology and Visual Health Research 5
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Visual perception and processing mechanisms 31
- Tactile and Sensory Interactions 8
- Neural dynamics and brain function 7
- Motor Control and Adaptation 5
- Epidemiology top 10%
- Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies 29
-
- Color perception and design 7
- Co-authors
- John G LawrensonSethu SheeladeviAlistair R. FielderSimon GrantDean R. MelmothJohn J. SloperMiriam L. ConwayMei Ying Boon
- Journals
- Clinical and Experimental Optometry (11 papers)Vision Research (10 papers)Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science (10 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Catherine Suttle
65 papers receiving 1.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 128
- Ophthalmology 368
- Cognitive Neuroscience 498
- Epidemiology 462
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 192
- Human-Computer Interaction 19
Countries citing papers authored by Catherine Suttle
This map shows the geographic impact of Catherine Suttle's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Catherine Suttle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Catherine Suttle more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Catherine Suttle
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Catherine Suttle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Catherine Suttle. The network helps show where Catherine Suttle may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Catherine Suttle, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2024 | 4 | |
| 2 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2024 | 2 | |
| 4 | 2023 | 2 | |
| 5 | 2022 | 2 | |
| 6 | 2022 | 28 | |
| 7 | 2021 | 5 | |
| 8 | 2018 | 3 | |
| 9 | 2018 | 18 | |
| 10 | 2015 | 13 | |
| 11 | 2011 | 6 | |
| 12 | 2011 | 18 | |
| 13 | 2009 | 6 | |
| 14 | 2009 | 12 | |
| 15 | 2009 | 2 | |
| 16 | 2007 | 15 | |
| 17 | 2005 | 10 | |
| 18 | 2003 | 4 | |
| 19 | 2002 | 23 | |
| 20 | 1999 | 30 |
About Catherine Suttle
Catherine Suttle is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Ophthalmology, Epidemiology, Statistics and Probability and Social Psychology, having authored 66 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (31 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (29 papers), Tactile and Sensory Interactions (8 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (7 papers), Color perception and design (7 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (6 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Health Research (5 papers) and Motor Control and Adaptation (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (368 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (498 citations), Epidemiology (462 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (192 citations) and Human-Computer Interaction (19 citations). Catherine Suttle has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include John G Lawrenson, Sethu Sheeladevi, Alistair R. Fielder, Simon Grant, Dean R. Melmoth, John J. Sloper, Miriam L. Conway, Mei Ying Boon, Alison L. Finlay and Lisa Asper. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical and Experimental Optometry, Vision Research, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics and Optometry and Vision Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.