Simon Grant

2.6k total citations
63 papers, 1.9k citations indexed

About

Simon Grant is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Molecular Biology and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Simon Grant has authored 63 papers receiving a total of 1.9k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 37 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 16 papers in Molecular Biology and 16 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Simon Grant's work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (29 papers), Motor Control and Adaptation (16 papers) and Retinal Development and Disorders (15 papers). Simon Grant is often cited by papers focused on Visual perception and processing mechanisms (29 papers), Motor Control and Adaptation (16 papers) and Retinal Development and Disorders (15 papers). Simon Grant collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Germany. Simon Grant's co-authors include Dean R. Melmoth, Michael J. Keating, Claus C. Hilgetag, Alison L. Finlay, Stewart Shipp, Michael J. Morgan, Merrick J. Moseley, John J. Sloper, Catherine Suttle and Miriam L. Conway and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Journal of Neuroscience and PLoS ONE.

In The Last Decade

Simon Grant

61 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Simon Grant United Kingdom 26 1.2k 466 331 291 267 63 1.9k
John Wattam-Bell United Kingdom 28 2.4k 1.9× 538 1.2× 253 0.8× 305 1.0× 180 0.7× 85 3.2k
Erik Vandenbussche Belgium 26 1.1k 0.9× 243 0.5× 537 1.6× 354 1.2× 101 0.4× 91 2.1k
Ruxandra Sireteanu Germany 28 2.0k 1.6× 903 1.9× 301 0.9× 350 1.2× 391 1.5× 83 2.4k
Deborah Giaschi Canada 30 2.0k 1.6× 981 2.1× 181 0.5× 156 0.5× 372 1.4× 95 2.3k
Roger W. Li United States 22 1.6k 1.3× 1.1k 2.4× 336 1.0× 494 1.7× 461 1.7× 57 2.5k
Samuel Sokol United States 25 1.2k 1.0× 452 1.0× 234 0.7× 552 1.9× 486 1.8× 48 1.8k
Ronald G. Boothe United States 17 715 0.6× 426 0.9× 216 0.7× 319 1.1× 273 1.0× 31 1.2k
Agnes Wong Canada 29 1.1k 0.9× 891 1.9× 152 0.5× 259 0.9× 601 2.3× 124 2.3k
Alyssa A. Brewer United States 17 2.8k 2.3× 166 0.4× 316 1.0× 473 1.6× 212 0.8× 42 3.3k
M. D. Sanders United Kingdom 19 1.2k 1.0× 212 0.5× 242 0.7× 294 1.0× 351 1.3× 40 2.3k

Countries citing papers authored by Simon Grant

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Simon Grant's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Simon Grant with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Simon Grant more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Simon Grant

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Simon Grant. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Simon Grant. The network helps show where Simon Grant may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Simon Grant

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Simon Grant. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Simon Grant based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Simon Grant. Simon Grant is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Grant, Simon & Miriam L. Conway. (2023). Deficits in Reach Planning and On-Line Grasp Control in Adults With Amblyopia. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 64(14). 45–45. 2 indexed citations
2.
Grant, Simon & Miriam L. Conway. (2019). Some binocular advantages for planning reach, but not grasp, components of prehension. Experimental Brain Research. 237(5). 1239–1255. 14 indexed citations
3.
Phillips, Tom J., et al.. (2018). Preeclamptic placentae release factors that damage neurons: implications for foetal programming of disease. PubMed. 2(4). NS20180139–NS20180139. 15 indexed citations
4.
Morgan, Michael J., Simon Grant, Dean R. Melmoth, & Joshua A. Solomon. (2015). Tilted frames of reference have similar effects on the perception of gravitational vertical and the planning of vertical saccadic eye movements. Experimental Brain Research. 233(7). 2115–2125. 17 indexed citations
5.
Grant, Simon & Miriam L. Conway. (2014). Reach-to-precision grasp deficits in amblyopia: Effects of object contrast and low visibility. Vision Research. 114. 100–110. 26 indexed citations
6.
Crofts, Joanna F., et al.. (2014). The Incarcerated Gravid Uterus. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 123(2). 423–427. 25 indexed citations
7.
Burden, Christy, et al.. (2012). Validation of Virtual Reality Simulation for Obstetric Ultrasonography. Simulation in Healthcare The Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare. 7(5). 269–273. 21 indexed citations
8.
Attilakos, George, Deborah G. Maddocks, Teresa Davies, et al.. (2011). Quantification of free fetal DNA in multiple pregnancies and relationship with chorionicity. Prenatal Diagnosis. 31(10). 967–972. 16 indexed citations
9.
Hilgetag, Claus C. & Simon Grant. (2010). Cytoarchitectural differences are a key determinant of laminar projection origins in the visual cortex. NeuroImage. 51(3). 1006–1017. 59 indexed citations
10.
Tibber, Marc S., Ayşe Pınar Saygın, Simon Grant, et al.. (2010). The Neural Correlates of Visuospatial Perceptual and Oculomotor Extrapolation. PLoS ONE. 5(3). e9664–e9664. 3 indexed citations
11.
Tibber, Marc S., Simon Grant, & Michael J. Morgan. (2009). Oculomotor responses and visuospatial perceptual judgments compete for common limited resources. Journal of Vision. 9(12). 21–21. 14 indexed citations
12.
Melmoth, Dean R., Marc S. Tibber, Simon Grant, & Michael J. Morgan. (2009). The Poggendorff illusion affects manual pointing as well as perceptual judgements. Neuropsychologia. 47(14). 3217–3224. 5 indexed citations
13.
Grant, Simon, Dean R. Melmoth, Michael J. Morgan, & Alison L. Finlay. (2007). Prehension Deficits in Amblyopia. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 48(3). 1139–1139. 133 indexed citations
14.
Melmoth, Dean R., et al.. (2007). Dissociation between vergence and binocular disparity cues in the control of prehension. Experimental Brain Research. 183(3). 283–298. 52 indexed citations
15.
Udin, Susan B. & Simon Grant. (1999). Plasticity in the tectum of Xenopus laevis: binocular maps. Progress in Neurobiology. 59(2). 81–106. 32 indexed citations
16.
Grant, Simon & Nancy E.J. Berman. (1995). Late loss of connections during callosal development in Siamese cats. Developmental Brain Research. 88(2). 132–147. 2 indexed citations
17.
Brickley, Stephen G., Michael J. Keating, & Simon Grant. (1994). Experience-dependent mechanism of binocular map plasticity in Xenopus: incongruent connections are masked by retinal input. Neuroscience Letters. 182(1). 13–16. 6 indexed citations
19.
Grant, Simon. (1990). Modelling cognitive aspects of complex control tasks. International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. 1017–1018. 5 indexed citations
20.
Grant, Simon & Michael J. Keating. (1989). Changing patterns of binocular visual connections in the intertectal system during development of the frog, Xenopus laevis. Experimental Brain Research. 75(1). 99–116. 23 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026