Anna M. Horwood

939 total citations
49 papers, 650 citations indexed

About

Anna M. Horwood is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Ophthalmology. According to data from OpenAlex, Anna M. Horwood has authored 49 papers receiving a total of 650 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 32 papers in Epidemiology, 26 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 12 papers in Ophthalmology. Recurrent topics in Anna M. Horwood's work include Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (32 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (23 papers) and Corneal surgery and disorders (9 papers). Anna M. Horwood is often cited by papers focused on Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (32 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (23 papers) and Corneal surgery and disorders (9 papers). Anna M. Horwood collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Netherlands and Germany. Anna M. Horwood's co-authors include Patricia Riddell, Jill Carlton, Helen Griffiths, Huibert J. Simonsz, Ben Williams, Rae Walker, Michael C. Brodsky, Harry J. de Koning, Peter Scarfe and Polly Waite and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Current Biology and Vision Research.

In The Last Decade

Anna M. Horwood

48 papers receiving 641 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Anna M. Horwood United Kingdom 16 447 290 275 157 145 49 650
ROBERT P. RUTSTEIN United States 15 468 1.0× 304 1.0× 362 1.3× 169 1.1× 181 1.2× 58 722
Rune Brautaset Sweden 16 289 0.6× 123 0.4× 381 1.4× 93 0.6× 327 2.3× 70 718
Susanna M. Tamkins United States 11 677 1.5× 436 1.5× 499 1.8× 89 0.6× 214 1.5× 12 853
Sjoukje E. Loudon Netherlands 18 649 1.5× 321 1.1× 475 1.7× 55 0.4× 284 2.0× 68 980
Deborah Orel‐Bixler United States 17 764 1.7× 328 1.1× 578 2.1× 71 0.5× 393 2.7× 30 1.0k
Arkady Selenow United States 12 396 0.9× 286 1.0× 176 0.6× 28 0.2× 101 0.7× 24 556
Jameel Rizwana Hussaindeen India 12 270 0.6× 108 0.4× 199 0.7× 46 0.3× 142 1.0× 42 522
PAUL N. DE LAND United States 7 307 0.7× 131 0.5× 179 0.7× 34 0.2× 88 0.6× 12 504
Krishna Kumar Ramani India 13 250 0.6× 69 0.2× 315 1.1× 67 0.4× 209 1.4× 24 527
Carmen Barnhardt United States 6 237 0.5× 147 0.5× 146 0.5× 27 0.2× 59 0.4× 9 392

Countries citing papers authored by Anna M. Horwood

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna M. Horwood's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna M. Horwood with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna M. Horwood more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna M. Horwood

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna M. Horwood. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna M. Horwood. The network helps show where Anna M. Horwood may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anna M. Horwood

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anna M. Horwood. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anna M. Horwood based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anna M. Horwood. Anna M. Horwood is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Horwood, Anna M.. (2022). When Does Blur Matter? A Narrative Review and Commentary. PubMed. 72(2). 57–68. 3 indexed citations
2.
Heijnsdijk, Eveline A.M., Allison R. Mackey, Gwen Carr, et al.. (2022). Availability of data for cost-effectiveness comparison of child vision and hearing screening programmes. Journal of Medical Screening. 30(2). 62–68. 3 indexed citations
3.
Carlton, Jill, et al.. (2022). A Comprehensive Overview of Vision Screening Programmes across 46 Countries. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 18(1). 27–27. 11 indexed citations
4.
Căinap, Simona, et al.. (2021). Implementation of paediatric vision screening in urban and rural areas in Cluj County, Romania. International Journal for Equity in Health. 20(1). 256–256. 4 indexed citations
5.
Carlton, Jill, et al.. (2021). Acceptability of childhood screening: a systematic narrative review. Public Health. 193. 126–138. 16 indexed citations
6.
Horwood, Anna M.. (2018). What Do We Expect New Graduate Orthoptists to Do?. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 14(1). 11–19. 1 indexed citations
7.
Horwood, Anna M., et al.. (2017). Asymmetrical accommodation in hyperopic anisometropic amblyopia. British Journal of Ophthalmology. 102(6). 772–778. 22 indexed citations
8.
Riddell, Patricia, Anna M. Horwood, & Peter Scarfe. (2017). Modelling cue weighting for naturalistic vergence and accommodation responses. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 58(8). 5411–5411. 2 indexed citations
9.
Horwood, Anna M. & Patricia Riddell. (2014). Disparity-driven vs blur-driven models of accommodation and convergence in binocular vision and intermittent strabismus. Journal of American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus. 18(6). 576–583. 19 indexed citations
10.
Horwood, Anna M. & Patricia Riddell. (2013). Developmental Changes in the Balance of Disparity, Blur, and Looming/Proximity Cues to Drive Ocular Alignment and Focus. Perception. 42(7). 693–715. 23 indexed citations
11.
Horwood, Anna M. & Patricia Riddell. (2013). The Clinical Near Gradient Stimulus AC/A Ratio Correlates Better With the Response CA/C Ratio Than With the Response AC/A Ratio. Strabismus. 21(2). 140–144. 8 indexed citations
12.
Horwood, Anna M. & Patricia Riddell. (2012). Evidence that convergence rather than accommodation controls intermittent distance exotropia. Acta Ophthalmologica. 90(2). e109–17. 44 indexed citations
13.
Horwood, Anna M. & Patricia Riddell. (2009). The Development of Infant Responses to Disparity, Blur and Proximity. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 50(13). 3817–3817. 2 indexed citations
14.
Horwood, Anna M. & Patricia Riddell. (2009). Receding and Disparity Cues Aid Relaxation of Accommodation. Optometry and Vision Science. 86(11). 1276–1286. 14 indexed citations
15.
Horwood, Anna M. & Patricia Riddell. (2008). Gender differences in early accommodation and vergence development. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics. 28(2). 115–126. 13 indexed citations
16.
Horwood, Anna M.. (2003). Too much or too little: neonatal ocular misalignment frequency can predict later abnormality. British Journal of Ophthalmology. 87(9). 1142–1145. 11 indexed citations
17.
Horwood, Anna M., et al.. (2002). Development of the response AC/A ratio over the first year of life. Vision Research. 42(22). 2521–2532. 37 indexed citations
18.
Horwood, Anna M., et al.. (2001). Variations in Accommodation and Convergence Responses in a Minimally Controlled Photorefractive Setting. Optometry and Vision Science. 78(11). 791–804. 23 indexed citations
19.
Riddell, Patricia, et al.. (1999). The response to prism deviations in human infants. Current Biology. 9(18). 1050–1052. 15 indexed citations
20.
Horwood, Anna M.. (1993). Maternal Observations of Ocular Alignment in Infants. Journal of Pediatric Ophthalmology & Strabismus. 30(2). 100–105. 13 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by ROBERT P. RUTSTEIN Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Rune Brautaset Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Susanna M. Tamkins Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Sjoukje E. Loudon Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Deborah Orel‐Bixler Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Arkady Selenow Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jameel Rizwana Hussaindeen Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by PAUL N. DE LAND Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Krishna Kumar Ramani Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Carmen Barnhardt
Rankless by CCL
2026