Carrie Menkel‐Meadow
- Law top 0.1%
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Political Science and International Relations top 5%
- Gender Studies top 5%
- Economics and Econometrics top 10%
- Co-authors
- Andrea SchneiderEllen Carol DuBoisCarol GilliganMichael WheelerCatharine A. MacKinnonShari Seidman DiamondPhilip A. RingstromLakshmi Balachandra
- Topics
- Legal Education and Practice Innovations (40 papers)Dispute Resolution and Class Actions (23 papers)Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (22 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaContemporary Sociology A Journal of ReviewsLaw & Society Review
- Partner nations
- United StatesSingaporeSpain
In The Last Decade
Carrie Menkel‐Meadow
101 papers receiving 705 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
- Law 406
- Sociology and Political Science 330
- Political Science and International Relations 187
- Gender Studies 173
- Economics and Econometrics 112
Countries citing papers authored by Carrie Menkel‐Meadow
This map shows the geographic impact of Carrie Menkel‐Meadow's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Carrie Menkel‐Meadow with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Carrie Menkel‐Meadow more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Carrie Menkel‐Meadow
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Carrie Menkel‐Meadow. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Carrie Menkel‐Meadow. The network helps show where Carrie Menkel‐Meadow may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Carrie Menkel‐Meadow
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Carrie Menkel‐Meadow. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Carrie Menkel‐Meadow based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Carrie Menkel‐Meadow. Carrie Menkel‐Meadow is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Alternative and Appropriate Dispute Resolution in Context Formal, Informal, and Semiformal Legal Processes | 2 |
| 2 | Crisis in Legal Education or the Other Things Law Students Should Be Learning and Doing | 2 |
| 3 | A sociologia comparada das advogadas: a feminização da profissão jurídica | 2 |
| 4 | Complex Dispute Resolution: Volume III: Introduction and Coda: International Dispute Resolution | 2 |
| 5 | Multi-party dispute resolution, democracy and decision-making | 1 |
| 6 | The Variable Morality of Constitutional (and Other) Compromises: A Comment on Sanford Levinson's Compromise and Constitutionalism | 0 |
| 7 | Process, People, Power and Policy: Empirical Studies of Civil Procedure and Courts | 1 |
| 8 | Empirical Studies of ADR: The Baseline Problem of What ADR is and What it is Compared to | 4 |
| 9 | Asylum in a Different Voice: Judging Immigration Claims and Gender | 0 |
| 10 | Is There an Honest Lawyer in the Box? Legal Ethics on TV | 0 |
| 11 | Are There Systemic Ethics Issues in Dispute System Design? And What We Should [Not] Do About It: Lessons From International and Domestic Fronts | 4 |
| 12 | Getting to 'Let's Talk': Comments on Collaborative Environmental Dispute Resolution Processes | 2 |
| 13 | Are Cross-Cultural Ethics Standards Possible or Desirable in International Arbitration? | 1 |
| 14 | Taking Law and . . . Really Seriously: Before, During and After the Law | 4 |
| 15 | Correspondences and Contradictions in International and Domestic Conflict Resolution: Lessons From General Theory and Varied Contexts | 3 |
| 16 | Telling Stories in School: Using Case Studies and Stories to Teach Legal Ethics | 12 |
| 17 | Do the "Haves" Come out Ahead in Alternative Judicial Systems?: Repeat Players in ADR | 9 |
| 18 | Sense and Sensibilities of Lawyers: Lawyering in Literature Narratives Film and Television and Ethical Choices Regarding Career and Craft, The | 4 |
| 19 | Taking the Mass Out of Mass Torts: Relfections of a Dalkon Shield Arbitrator on Alternative Dispute Resolution, Judging, Neutrality, Gender, and Process | 3 |
| 20 | Ethics and the Settlements of Mass Torts: When the Rules Meet the Road | 5 |
About Carrie Menkel‐Meadow
Carrie Menkel‐Meadow is a scholar working on Law, Strategy and Management and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 125 papers that have together received 933 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Legal Education and Practice Innovations (40 papers), Dispute Resolution and Class Actions (23 papers) and Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (22 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Law (406 citations), Gender Studies (173 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (187 citations). Carrie Menkel‐Meadow has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Singapore and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Andrea Schneider, Ellen Carol DuBois, Carol Gilligan, Michael Wheeler, Catharine A. MacKinnon, Shari Seidman Diamond, Philip A. Ringstrom, Lakshmi Balachandra, Robert G. Meadow and Jean R. Sternlight. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews and Law & Society Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.