Caroline Ruiner

512 total citations
34 papers, 224 citations indexed

About

Caroline Ruiner is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, General Health Professions and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management. According to data from OpenAlex, Caroline Ruiner has authored 34 papers receiving a total of 224 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 11 papers in General Health Professions and 7 papers in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management. Recurrent topics in Caroline Ruiner's work include Digital Economy and Work Transformation (6 papers), Digital Transformation in Industry (5 papers) and Labor Movements and Unions (5 papers). Caroline Ruiner is often cited by papers focused on Digital Economy and Work Transformation (6 papers), Digital Transformation in Industry (5 papers) and Labor Movements and Unions (5 papers). Caroline Ruiner collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Austria and Russia. Caroline Ruiner's co-authors include Matthias Klumpp, Maximiliane Wilkesmann, Marc Hesenius, Volker Gruhn, Ole Meyer, Sabine Salloch, Uta Wilkens, Vera Hagemann, Laura Marie Edinger‐Schons and Jochen Vollmann and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Sustainability and BMC Health Services Research.

In The Last Decade

Caroline Ruiner

31 papers receiving 213 citations

Peers

Caroline Ruiner
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Sociology and Political Science 53
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 52
  • General Health Professions 41
  • Strategy and Management 35
  • Social Psychology 28
Replace Matt Beane with:
Matt Beane United States
Jean Renaud France
Lourdes Cános Darós Spain
Peter Brödner Germany
Ina Kayser Germany
Leslie J. Wardley Canada
Gavin Bailey United Kingdom
An‐Jin Shie Taiwan
Leif Jarle Gressgård Norway
Alessandro Delfanti Canada
Matt Beane United States View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Caroline Ruiner
Caroline Ruiner · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Caroline Ruiner
Caroline Ruiner · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Caroline Ruiner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Caroline Ruiner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Caroline Ruiner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Caroline Ruiner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Caroline Ruiner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Caroline Ruiner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Caroline Ruiner. The network helps show where Caroline Ruiner may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Caroline Ruiner

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Caroline Ruiner. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Caroline Ruiner based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Caroline Ruiner. Caroline Ruiner is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 0
2 2
3 3
4 0
5 2
6 9
7 1
8 2
9 2
10 5
11 4
12 2
13 8
14 2
15
Locum Doctors-Curse or Blessing for Hospitals?
3
16 4
17 1
18 11
19 5
20 2

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026